Using Critical Evaluation And Peer Review Writing Assignments In A Chemical Process Safety Course
Using Critical Evaluation And Peer Review Writing Assignments In A Chemical Process Safety Course
复制标题
在化学过程安全课程中使用批判性评估和同行评审写作作业
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Ludlow
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Ludlow
同行评审的双方都吸取了经验教训，无论是那些批判性地评价别人的工作的人，还是那些工作被评价的人。初稿往往会有所改进，因为学生们意识到他们的同龄人会阅读他们的作品。最终的草稿得到了改进，因为学生们得到了一个正式的方法来修改原始报告，以回应审查。审稿人受益于被迫评估别人的写作，并考虑导致有效报告的要素。当然，教师必须提供足够的结构和指导，以防止学生给予完全负面或分层的评价。本文介绍了两种技巧，以帮助学生发展他们的批判性思维和沟通技巧。在第一，学生被要求批判性地审查期刊文章，并准备一个简短的评价期刊文章。第二个技巧是让学生与他们的同伴练习匿名裁判过程。这些技术中的每
Lessons are learned on both sides of the peer review, both by those who are critically evaluating someone else’s work and by those whose work is evaluated. The first drafts tend to be improved because the students realize that their peers will be reading their writing. The final drafts improve since the students are provided with a formalized method to revise the original report in response to the review. The reviewer benefits from being forced to evaluate someone else’s writing and to consider the elements that lead to an effective report. Of course, the instructor must provide sufficient structure and guidance to prevent students from giving entirely negative or hierarchical evaluations. This paper presents two techniques to help students develop their critical thinking and communication skills. In the first, students are asked to critically review a journal article and to prepare a brief evaluation of the journal article. The second technique described is to allow the students to practice the anonymous refereeing process with their peers 5 . Each of these techniques