Protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations conducted on gender-transformative interventions aimed at preventing unintended pregnancy and promoting sexual health in adolescents.
Protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations conducted on gender-transformative interventions aimed at preventing unintended pregnancy and promoting sexual health in adolescents.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056553
复制
发表时间：
2022-05-24
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Nkonki, Lungiswa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ncube, Janet;Adom, Theodosia;Nkonki, Lungiswa
在计划生育和生殖健康方面，性别变革方法包括帮助社区理解和挑战导致男女不平等长期存在的社会规范，并改善妇女获得关键服务的机会。本系统综述的目的是综合关于性别变革干预措施经济评估的最佳现有证据，旨在预防意外怀孕和促进青少年性健康，评估经济评估研究的方法质量并找出证据中的差距。我们将在以下书目数据库中检索符合我们选择标准的经济评估； PubMed、Cochrane、国家卫生服务 EE 数据库、SCOPUS、CINHAL、Web of Science 和儿科 EE 数据库。我们还将进行灰色文献检索。检索将在1990年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间进行。两名独立评审员将进行筛选、数据提取和质量评估。我们将考虑经济评估的以下结果；相对资源使用、成本和增量成本效益比、增量净效益比或净现值、质量调整生命年和残疾调整生命年。将使用综合卫生经济评估报告标准声明和卫生经济标准共识清单进行质量评估。结果将使用汇总表并以叙述方式报告。将尝试使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的三乘三优势排名矩阵工具来比较相关的成本效益研究。不需要伦理批准，因为审查不会使用个体患者数据，而是使用公开的经济评估研究。然而，从斯泰伦博斯大学健康研究伦理委员会获得了伦理豁免，参考号：X21/05/012。系统评价的结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上，并在相关的科学会议上发表。 CRD42021264698。
In the context of family planning and reproductive health, a gender-transformative approach involves helping communities understand and challenge the social norms that perpetuate inequalities between men and women, and improving women’s access to key services. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesise the best available evidence on economic evaluations of gender transformative interventions targeted at preventing unintended pregnancy and promoting sexual health in adolescents, assess the methodological quality of the economic evaluation studies and identify gaps in the evidence. We will search the following bibliographic databases for economic evaluations that meet our selection criteria; PubMed, Cochrane, National Health Service EE database, SCOPUS, CINHAL, Web of Science and Paediatric EE Database. We will additionally conduct a grey literature search. The search will be conducted for the period 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2021. Two independent reviewers will conduct the screening, data extraction and quality assessment. We will consider the following outcomes from economic evaluations; relative resource use, cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, incremental net benefit ratio or net present value, quality-adjusted life-years and disability-adjusted life-years. Quality assessment will be conducted using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement and the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria checklist. Results will be reported using summary tables and narratively. Attempts will be made to use the Joanna Briggs Institute three-by-three dominance ranking matrix tool to compare relevant cost-effectiveness studies. Ethics approval is not required because the review will not use individual patient data, instead publicly available economic evaluation research studies will be used. However, an ethics exemption was obtained from the Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee, Reference No: X21/05/012. The results of the systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant scientific conference. CRD42021264698.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1080/13691058.2015.1035751
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
Culture, health & sexuality
影响因子：
--
作者：
Dworkin SL;Fleming PJ;Colvin CJ
通讯作者：
Colvin CJ
DOI：
10.1097/xeb.0000000000000063
发表时间：
2015-09-01
影响因子：
--
作者：
Gomersall, Judith Streak;Jadotte, Yuri Tertilus;Preda, Alin
通讯作者：
Preda, Alin
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Husereau, Don;Drummond, Michael;Loder, Elizabeth
通讯作者：
Loder, Elizabeth
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Shepherd, J.;Kavanagh, J.;Price, A.
通讯作者：
Price, A.
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Mangham-Jefferies, Lindsay;Pitt, Catherine;Schellenberg, Joanna
通讯作者：
Schellenberg, Joanna