A Longitudinal View of Apathy and Its Impact After Stroke
A Longitudinal View of Apathy and Its Impact After Stroke
复制标题
DOI:
10.1161/strokeaha.109.554410
复制
发表时间:
2009-10-01
期刊:
影响因子:
8.3
通讯作者:
Wood-Dauphinee, Sharon
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mayo, Nancy E.;Fellows, Lesley K.;Wood-Dauphinee, Sharon
Background and Purpose-Stroke survivors are often described as apathetic. Because apathy may be a barrier to participation in promising therapies, more needs to be learned about apathy symptoms after stroke. The specific objective was to estimate the extent to which apathy changes with time over the first year after stroke and the impact of apathy on recovery.Methods-The Apathy Assessed cohort was formed from stroke survivors participating in a longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after stroke. A family caregiver completed an apathy questionnaire by telephone at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after stroke (n = 408). Group-based trajectory modeling and ordinal regression were used to identify distinctive groups of individuals with similar trajectories of apathy over the first year after stroke and predictors of apathy trajectory.Results-Both 3- and 5-group trajectory models fit the data. We used the 5-group model because of the potential to further explore the apathy construct. The largest group (50%) had low apathy and 33% had minor apathy that remained stable throughout the first year after stroke. A small proportion (3%) of the study sample had high apathy that remained high. Two other groups of almost equal size (7%) showed worsening and improving apathy. Poor cognitive status, low functional status, and high comorbidity predicted higher apathy. High apathy had a significant negative effect on physical function, participation, health perception, and physical health over the first 12 months after stroke.Conclusion-Some degree of apathy was prevalent and persistent after stroke and was predicted by older age, poor cognitive status, and low functional status after stroke. Even a minor level of apathy had an important and statistically significant impact on stroke outcomes. (Stroke. 2009;40:3299-3307.)