Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy
Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/019394599902100603
复制
发表时间：
1999-12-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Kendall, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kendall, J
本文的目的是描述扎根理论研究的两种方法之间的异同：格拉泽所支持的扎根理论和施特劳斯和科尔宾所支持的扎根理论。本文的重点是围绕轴向编码使用的争议。作者提出了解决这一争议的方法，建议人们不需要将任何一种方法视为正确或错误；只要正确即可。相反，定性和扎根理论研究人员可以选择方法，并且该选择基于研究人员的研究目标。本书提供了这两种方法的示例，这些示例取自作者对有注意力缺陷多动障碍 (ADHD) 儿童的家庭生活经历的研究。
The purpose of this article is to describe the similarities and differences between two approaches to grounded theory research: grounded theory as espoused by Glaser and grounded theory as espoused by Strauss and Corbin. The focus of the article is the controversy surrounding the use of axial coding. The author proposes a resolution to the controversy by suggesting that one does not need to view either approach as right or wrong; rather the qualitative and grounded theory researcher can choose on approach, and that choice is based on the goal of the researcher's study. Examples of both approaches, from the author's research study on the experiences of living in a family with a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), are provided.