Response-Dependent Responsibility; or, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Blame
Response-Dependent Responsibility; or, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Blame
复制标题
响应相关的责任；
DOI：
10.1215/00318108-4173422
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
David W. Shoemaker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
David W. Shoemaker
有许多有争议的特点P.F.斯特劳森的《自由与怨恨》但大多数人拒绝的特点是斯特劳森的道德责任的反应依赖的观点。通过依靠我们的人际责任反应（反应性态度，如怨恨，愤怒和内疚）以及倾向于暂停它们的原因，以解释“当我们谈论道德语言时，我们所说的沙漠，责任，内疚，谴责和正义”（Strawson 2003，91;强调原文），Strawson坚持认为，负责任是一种负责任的行为。
There are many contested features of P. F. Strawson’s “Freedom and Resentment.” But the feature most people reject is Strawson’s responsedependent view of moral responsibility. By leaning on our interpersonal responsibility responses (reactive attitudes such as resentment, indignation, and guilt) and what tends to suspend them in order to account for “all we mean, when, speaking the language of morals, we speak of desert, responsibility, guilt, condemnation, and justice” (Strawson 2003, 91; emphasis in original), Strawson maintains that being responsible is a