Engaging with the future of ‘critical heritage studies’: looking back in order to look forward
Engaging with the future of ‘critical heritage studies’: looking back in order to look forward
复制标题
展望“批判遗产研究”的未来：回顾过去，展望未来
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K. Buckley
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Witcomb;K. Buckley
这篇文章与批判遗产研究协会宣言进行了接触，该协会认为遗产研究需要彻底革新。我们通过回顾前面的两个时刻来做到这一点。第一次，博物馆研究也呼吁进行翻新，借鉴这些经验，认为这些经验可能对遗产研究的未来具有潜在的指导意义。第二个是文化研究内部关于与学术界以外的世界接触以实现该学科的政治目标的价值的辩论。因此，虽然我们同意《宣言》提出的问题，但我们认为，与其用一种将专业领域定位为需要从无到有地革新的方式来描述辩论的术语，我们可能会更好地培养一种更有组织的脑力劳动意识，一种重视参与和合作而不是为了本身而批评的意识。我们的结论指出，遗产研究教学作为这种实践的潜在场所以及更多合作研究实践的模式，具有重要意义。
This article engages with the Association for Critical Heritage Studies Manifesto which argues that heritage studies is in need of a complete renovation. We do so by looking back to two earlier moments. The first when museum studies also called for a renovation, drawing on those experiences as potentially instructive for the immediate future of heritage studies. The second a debate within cultural studies on the value of engagement with the world outside of academia to achieve the discipline’s political aims. Thus, while agreeing with the questions posed by the Manifesto, we argue that rather than casting the terms of the debate in a way that positions the professional field as needing renovation from without, we might do better by fostering a more ‘organic’ sense of intellectual work, one that values engagement and collaboration rather than critique for its own sake. Our conclusion points to the importance of the teaching of heritage studies as a potential site for such a practice as well as more collaborative models of research practice.