Development of Sensory Sensitivity Scales (SeSS): Reliability and validity analyses
Development of Sensory Sensitivity Scales (SeSS): Reliability and validity analyses
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103612
复制
发表时间：
2020-05-01
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Kalaycioglu, Canan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aykan, Simge;Vatansever, Gozde;Kalaycioglu, Canan
背景：虽然成年人的感觉灵敏度存在差异，但现有的灵敏度量表大多是针对儿童开发的。有限数量的成人量表测量社会/情感功能和modalities together.Aims：To develop scales for adults that evaluate visual，auditory and somatosensory sensitivity as separate domain and independent of social/emotional features.Methods and procedures：两个连续的研究（视听部分和体感部分）进行了使用相同的方法。两项研究均包括一个试验组（n（1）= 405和n（2）= 294）和一个主研究组（n（1）= 425和n（2）= 603）。探索性因素分析产生了视觉和听觉领域的单因素解决方案和躯体感觉领域的三因素解决方案（触摸，疼痛和瘙痒）的感觉灵敏度量表。结果和结果：验证性因素分析显示，在视觉的良好的结构效度（CFI = 0.973，TLI = 0.965，RMSEA = 0.075）听觉（CFI = 0.943，TLI = 0.927，RMSEA = 0.074）和躯体感觉（CFI = 0.955，TLI = 0.946，RMSEA = 0.048）量表。这些类别是内部一致的（α（v）= 0.86，α（a）= 0.79，α（s）= 0.69）。作为聚合效度的指标，较高的自闭症特征与较高的敏感性相关（r（s）（-v）= .17，r（s-a）= .25，r（s）（-s）= .14）。结论和影响：感觉敏感性量表（SeSS）可用于筛选感觉敏感性变异或识别和随访成人感觉干预的结果。
Background: Although adults are known to have sensory sensitivity differences, existing sensitivity scales have been mostly developed for children. The limited number of adult scales measure social/emotional features and modalities together.Aims: To develop scales for adults that evaluate visual, auditory and somatosensory sensitivities as separate domains and independent of social/emotional features.Methods and procedures: Two consecutive studies (visual-auditory part and somatosensory part) were conducted using the same methods. Both studies included a pilot (n(1) = 405 and n(2) = 294) and a main group (n(1) = 425 and n(2) = 603). An exploratory factor analysis produced a single-factor solution for the visual and auditory domains and a three-factor solution for the somato-sensory domain (touch, pain, and itch) of Sensory Sensitivity Scales.Outcomes and results: A confirmatory factor analysis revealed good construct validity in the the visual (CFI = .973, TLI = .965, and RMSEA = .075) auditory (CFI = .943, TLI = .927, and RMSEA = .074) and somatosensory (CFI = .955, TLI = .946, and RMSEA = .048) scales. The categories were internally consistent (alpha(v) = .86, alpha(a) = .79, alpha(s) = .69). As an indicator of convergent validity, higher autistic traits were related to higher sensitivity (r(s)(-v) = .17, r(s-a) = .25, r(s)(-s) = .14).Conclusions and implications: Sensory Sensitivity Scales (SeSS) can be used to screen sensory sensitivity variability or identify and follow up the outcome of sensory interventions in adults.