Job Satisfaction in the “Big Four” of Europe: Reasoning Between Feeling and Uncertainty Through CUB Models
Job Satisfaction in the “Big Four” of Europe: Reasoning Between Feeling and Uncertainty Through CUB Models
复制标题
欧洲“四大”的工作满意度：通过 CUB 模型在感觉和不确定性之间进行推理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mirko Buonocore
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Punzo;Rosalia Castellano;Mirko Buonocore
本文对四个具有代表性的西欧国家的人们在工作中感到满意的客观和主观驱动力进行了比较调查。这项工作的新颖之处在于，它将全球工作满意度的主要决定因素的跨国相似性和差异研究与方法问题联系起来，这些问题是在通过自我评估在评级量表上检测到对调查问题的回答时产生的。特别是，本文是第一次尝试在更广泛的概念框架内测试CUB模型对EWCS数据的潜力，其中对总体工作满意度的反应取决于评价过程的一些心理动态。尽管英国和德国员工的总体工作满意度明显更高，但主观因素——工作中体现的社会经济保障的数量、工作条件和工作与生活平衡的各个方面——是塑造工作满意度最相关的因素，而忽略了将收入视为主导因素的神话。
The paper offers a comparative investigation of objective and subjective driving forces behind the satisfaction that people feel in their job in four representative countries of Western Europe. The main element of this work’s novelty is its linking the research of cross-country similarities and differences in the leading determinants of global job satisfaction to methodological issues that arise when responses to survey questions are detected on a rating scale through self-evaluation. In particular, this paper is one of the first attempts to test the potentialities of CUB models on EWCS data in a broader conceptual framework in which the response on overall job satisfaction depends on some psychological dynamics of the evaluation process. Although overall job satisfaction is significantly higher for British and German employees, the subjective factors—the amount of socio-economic security embodied in a job, the working conditions and the aspects of work–life balance—are the most relevant in shaping job satisfaction, disregarding the myth that considers earnings as the dominant factor.