Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
Toward responsible scholarly communication and innovation: A survey of the prevalence of retracted articles on scholarly communication platforms
复制标题
迈向负责任的学术传播和创新：学术传播平台上撤稿文章流行率的调查
DOI：
10.1002/pra2.155
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Shinji Mine
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
廣田美香; 堤智昭; 松村敦;沼口天; 松村敦;佐藤祐吾; 松村敦;Zhelin XU; Atsushi MATSUMURA; Tetsuji SATOH;廣田美香，松村 敦，宇陀則彦;守家いづみ，松村 敦，宇陀則彦;森彩乃；松村敦；宇陀則彦;石井里奈；松村敦；宇陀則彦;奥出夢美；松村敦；宇陀則彦;椎名智紀；松村敦；宇陀則彦;青山優里彩；松村敦；宇陀則彦;Shinji Mine
开放的学术交流使我们前所未有地开放学术信息和许多创新，但它需要足够的质量控制。这项研究旨在确定2019年初所有学科撤回文章的在线可用性程度。在2000年至2018年期间发表的Web of Science中共识别出1，541篇文章。使用Google、Google Scholar和Sci‐Hub，在正式和非正式平台上检索文章全文。结果显示，即使是正式的出版商也不能遵守出版伦理委员会（科普）的指导方针（例如，缺乏撤回警报和开放可用性），非正式平台上的大多数副本都是非版本记录，缺乏任何撤回信息。这项初步研究表明，学术交流平台，特别是非正式平台对撤回文章的在线传播和质量控制不足。
Open scholarly communication benefits us with unprecedented open access to scholarly information and many innovations, but it requires adequate quality control. This study aims to identify the extent of online availability of retracted articles across all disciplines in early 2019. In all, 1,541 articles were identified in Web of Science, published between 2000 and 2018. Using Google, Google Scholar, and Sci‐Hub, the full text of articles were searched on formal and informal platforms. The results showed that while even formal publishers could not comply with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (e.g., the lack of retraction alerts and open availability), most copies on informal platforms were non‐Version of Record, lacking any information of retraction. This preliminary study showed online propagation and inadequate quality control of the retracted articles by scholarly communication platforms, particularly by informal platforms.