Initial Investigation of Elderly Drivers’ Acceptability for Proactive Intervention by Intelligent Vehicle

Initial Investigation of Elderly Drivers’ Acceptability for Proactive Intervention by Intelligent Vehicle
复制标题

老年驾驶员对智能汽车主动干预的接受程度初步调查

DOI:
10.1007/s13177-017-0137-3
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
M. Kamata
M. Kamata
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Takuma Ito;Tatsuya Shino;M. Kamata

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在这项研究中,我们重点关注老年驾驶员对主动防撞系统的接受程度,该系统在驾驶员进入危险情况前几秒钟运行。为了了解接受和拒绝的原因和机制,我们使用驾驶模拟器进行了实验。此外,我们还使用 DSQ、WSQ 和 NEO-PI-R 等问卷调查了个人特征。因此,虽然许多老年驾驶员接受主动制动干预,但超过一半的人不接受主动转向干预。此外,在本研究中,我们将老年驾驶员对主动防撞系统的评估分为特定组,以更好地了解他们接受和拒绝背后的机制。在某些情况下,我们确认问卷中所体现的驾驶员特征似乎是拒绝主动干预系统的原因。最后,我们提出了新的方法,包括使用触觉系统进行共享控制和使用视觉人机界面设备进行信息共享,作为提高老年驾驶员对下一步的接受度的方法。
In this study, we focused on the acceptability of elderly drivers for proactive collision avoidance systems that operate several seconds before drivers enter dangerous situations. To understand the reasons and mechanisms of acceptance and refusal, we conducted an experiment using a driving simulator. In addition, we investigated the individual characteristics using questionnaires such as DSQ, WSQ, and NEO-PI-R. As a result, while many elderly drivers accepted proactive braking intervention, more than half did not accept proactive steering intervention. Furthermore, in this study, we classified evaluations of elderly driver for proactive collision avoidance systems into specific groups to better understand the mechanisms behind their acceptance and refusal. For some cases, we confirmed that drivers’ characteristics represented in the questionnaires seemed to be the reasons of refusals for the proactive intervention systems. Finally, we proposed new approaches, including use of haptic systems for shared controls and visual human machine interface devices for information sharing, as ways to improve the acceptance by elderly drivers towards the next step.