Theory and Evidence
Theory and Evidence
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1468-0149.1982.tb01895.x
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Leora F. Klapper;Allen Berger;Zsuzsanna Fluck;William Greene;J. Kallberg;Richard Rosen;Anthony Saunders;Greg Udell;Larry
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Leora F. Klapper;Allen Berger;Zsuzsanna Fluck;William Greene;J. Kallberg;Richard Rosen;Anthony Saunders;Greg Udell;Larry
This paper finds theoretical and empirical evidence that secured lines of credit (L/Cs) are associated with business borrowers who exhibit a high risk of default. Our stylized theoretical model discusses an optimal use of L/Cs when an entrepreneur has the ability costlessly to divert cash flow to himself and when it is prohibitively costly for a third party (such as a court) to prove diversion. However, our model differs from previous work by specifically linking moral hazard to the liquidation of short-term assets, such as accounts receivable. Specifically, the model demonstrates that the value of a secured L/C in minimizing contracting costs is associated with the business risk of the borrower and the quality of the borrower's customers. Empirical tests on a sample of publicly traded manufacturing firms offer support for the predictions of the model. We find that firms with secured L/Cs are observably riskier and have fewer expected growth opportunities.