Experience versus perception of corruption: Russia as a test case
Experience versus perception of corruption: Russia as a test case
复制标题
经验与腐败认知：俄罗斯作为测试案例
DOI：
10.1080/17440571003669175
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
W. Mishler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Rose;W. Mishler
腐败之所以重要，是因为它破坏了官僚机构的可预测性，是对支持一个政治制度的潜在威胁。对腐败的看法是衡量腐败实际发生率最常用的尺度。这篇文章整理了新俄罗斯晴雨表的调查数据，以挑战这一假设。尽管大多数俄罗斯人认为各种日常公共服务都是腐败的，但这种评估并不是基于第一手经验。只有少数人行贿。我们测试四个假设的差异，个人的看法和经验的行贿：支付能力，接触公共服务，规范的可接受性和政治意识。接触对于行贿最为重要，而政治意识对于腐败的感知最为重要。我们还测试了对腐败的看法和经历，以及其他形式的政治和经济表现，对政权的支持有多大影响。支持的动力是政府的实质性业绩，特别是政府对经济的管理，而不是对腐败的看法或经历。
Corruption is important because it undermines bureaucratic predictability and is a potential threat to support for a political regime. The perception of corruption is the most commonly used measure of the actual incidence of corruption. This article marshals the New Russia Barometer survey data to challenge this assumption. Even though most Russians perceive a variety of everyday public services as corrupt, this assessment is not based on first-hand experience. Only a minority pays bribes. We test four hypotheses about differences in individual perception and experience of paying bribes: the ability to pay, contact with public services, normative acceptability and political awareness. Contact is most important for paying bribes whereas political awareness is most important for the perception of corruption. We also test how much the perception and experience of corruption, as against other forms of political and economic performance, affect support for the regime. Support is driven by the substantive performance of government, especially its management of the economy, rather than by the perception or experience of corruption.