Obstacles and approaches in artificial cultivation of Chinese cordyceps.
Obstacles and approaches in artificial cultivation of Chinese cordyceps.
复制标题
冬虫夏草人工栽培的障碍与途径
DOI:
10.1080/21501203.2018.1442132
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Li X
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Qin QL;Zhou GL;Zhang H;Meng Q;Zhang JH;Wang HT;Miao L;Li X
Chinese cordyceps, also known as “Dong Chong Xia Cao” in Chinese, which means being worm in winter and herb in summer, is the fruiting body of Ophiocordyceps sinensis developed from the cadaver mummy (sclerotium) of infected ghost moth larva distributed in the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau around the altitude of 3000–5000 m (Zhang et al. 2012). It is a well-known traditional Chinese medicine mostly because of its legendary miraculous beneficial effects to human health and its very high prices in the market, which reached as high as USD 60,000 per kg in 2015 (Lei et al. 2015). Almost all the Chinese cordyceps in the market are harvested in the alpine pasture of the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau during the period of May to July every year, which severely damage the pasture vegetation and ecology of the plateau. A lot of institutions and companies have been investing huge resources to explore artificial cultivation of Chinese cordyceps indoor or in its natural habitat for a long time, but failed until recent because of difficulties of artificially completing both life cycles of host insect and fungal infection in the host involved in the cultivation. It is known that several institutions and companies have been successful in artificial cultivation of Chinese cordyceps. However, there is no formal scientific report on the details of this success, which is probably because of huge commercial interests behind the area and technical know-hows in which developers do not want to share with others. In this short note, we briefly present some technical bottlenecks retarding the progress of artificial cultivation of Chinese cordyceps empirically and list some examples of the success from personal communications. It is a need to illustrate that the information provided below is more empirical than scientific.