Steering resilience in coastal and marine cultural heritage
Steering resilience in coastal and marine cultural heritage
复制标题
引导沿海和海洋文化遗产的复原力
作者：
Wesley Flannery;Kristen Ounanian;Hilde M. Toonen;J. V. van Tatenhove;B. Murtagh;Laura Ferguson;A. Delaney;J. Kenter;E. Azzopardi;C. Pita;D. Mylona;L. Witteveen;C. Hansen;Matt Howells;Jordi Vegas Macias;M. Lamers;L. Sousa;Ana Margarida Ferreira da Silva;Steve Taylor;Maili Roio;K. Karro;Tanel Saimre
沿海和海洋文化遗产（CMCH）由于其所处的地理位置和往往难以确定的价值而面临风险。由于这些风险在未来可能会加剧，因此迫切需要建立CMCH的复原力。我们认为，目前的CMCH风险管理范式狭隘地侧重于现在和保存。这往往排除了关于恢复力有争议的本质以及如何在严格的保护主义方法之外实现恢复力的辩论。因此，有必要建立一个更广泛、更有活力的CMCH管理框架，认识到从严格的保护主义方法的转变，并纳入遗产的社会政治背景的复杂性。借鉴批判性文化遗产文献，我们通过重新思考文化遗产的暂时性来重新定义CMCH管理。我们认为，文化遗产可能以四种社会时间表现形式存在（现存的、丢失的、休眠的和潜在的），而CMCH管理包括三个广泛的社会政治指导过程（连续性、非连续性和转型）。我们对CMCH管理的重新概念化是应对CMCH管理中存在陷阱的第一步。它提供了一个有用的概念框架，通过它来理解保护主义方法之外的过程，并提出了关于CMCH的偶然性和争议性的问题，关于损失和转型的伦理问题，以及文化遗产管理的民主化。
Coastal and marine cultural heritage (CMCH) is at risk due to its location and its often indefinable value. As these risks are likely to intensify in the future, there is an urgent need to build CMCH resilience. We argue that the current CMCH risk management paradigm narrowly focuses on the present and preservation. This tends to exclude debates about the contested nature of resilience and how it may be achieved beyond a strict preservationist approach. There is a need, therefore, to progress a broader and more dynamic framing of CMCH management that recognises the shift away from strict preservationist approaches and incorporates the complexity of heritage’s socio-political contexts. Drawing on critical cultural heritage literature, we reconceptualise CMCH management by rethinking the temporality of cultural heritage. We argue that cultural heritage may exist in four socio-temporal manifestations (extant, lost, dormant, and potential) and that CMCH management consists of three broad socio-political steering processes (continuity, discontinuity, and transformation). Our reconceptualisation of CMCH management is a first step in countering the presentness trap in CMCH management. It provides a useful conceptual framing through which to understand processes beyond the preservationist approach and raises questions about the contingent and contested nature of CMCH, ethical questions around loss and transformation, and the democratisation of cultural heritage management.
预期损失：重新思考遗产未来的危险
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
DeSilvey C
通讯作者：
DeSilvey C