Understanding the Thalidomide Chirality in Biological Processes by the Self-disproportionation of Enantiomers

Understanding the Thalidomide Chirality in Biological Processes by the Self-disproportionation of Enantiomers
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/s41598-018-35457-6
复制
发表时间:
2018-11-20
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Shibata, Norio
Shibata, Norio
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tokunaga, Etsuko;Yamamoto, Takeshi;Shibata, Norio

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在20世纪50年代末沙利度胺灾难发生20年后,Blaschke等人报道,只有沙利度胺的(S)-对映体是致畸的。然而,其他研究表明,沙利度胺的对映体在体内相互转化,这就引出了一个问题:为什么在使用(R)-沙利度胺的动物实验中没有观察到致畸活性,考虑到体内外消旋化(“沙利度胺悖论”)?在此,我们揭示了一个假说来解释这种“沙利度胺悖论”通过在体内自我-反映异构体。在搅拌沙利度胺在给定溶剂中的20%ee溶液后,在溶液中可重复地观察到高达98%ee的显著对映体富集。我们推测,沙利度胺对映异构体的一部分在体内差向异构化,然后沉淀外消旋沙利度胺(R/S)-异二聚体形式。因此,外消旋沙利度胺很可能在以(R/S)-异二聚体形式外消旋沉淀后从生物过程中除去。另一方面,对映体纯的沙利度胺保留在溶液中,提供观察到的生物实验结果:(S)-对映体是致畸的,而(R)-对映体不是。
Twenty years after the thalidomide disaster in the late 1950s, Blaschke et al. reported that only the (S)-enantiomer of thalidomide is teratogenic. However, other work has shown that the enantiomers of thalidomide interconvert in vivo, which begs the question: why is teratogen activity not observed in animal experiments that use (R)-thalidomide given the ready in vivo racemization ("thalidomide paradox")? Herein, we disclose a hypothesis to explain this "thalidomide paradox" through the in-vivo self-disproportionation of enantiomers. Upon stirring a 20% ee solution of thalidomide in a given solvent, significant enantiomeric enrichment of up to 98% ee was observed reproducibly in solution. We hypothesize that a fraction of thalidomide enantiomers epimerizes in vivo, followed by precipitation of racemic thalidomide in (R/S)-heterodimeric form. Thus, racemic thalidomide is most likely removed from biological processes upon racemic precipitation in (R/S)-heterodimeric form. On the other hand, enantiomerically pure thalidomide remains in solution, affording the observed biological experimental results: the (S)-enantiomer is teratogenic, while the (R)-enantiomer is not.