Salpingo-oophorectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.
Salpingo-oophorectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/aog.0000000000001592
复制
发表时间：
2016-09
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Evans EC;Matteson KA;Orejuela FJ;Alperin M;Balk EM;El-Nashar S;Gleason JL;Grimes C;Jeppson P;Mathews C;Wheeler TL;Murphy M;Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group
目的：比较良性子宫切除术时输卵管卵巢切除术与卵巢保留的长期风险。数据来源：MEDLINE、临床试验。政府和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库的检索时间从开始到 2015 年 1 月 30 日。我们纳入了对接受良性子宫切除术、接受双侧输卵管卵巢切除术 (BSO) 或保留一侧或双侧卵巢的女性的前瞻性和回顾性比较研究。 研究选择方法：审稿人对 5,568 条引用进行了双重筛选，并将符合条件的研究提取成定制形式。二十六项比较研究符合纳入标准。对研究的结果、质量和证据强度进行了评估。
OBJECTIVE:To compare the long-term risks associated with salpingo-oophorectomy with ovarian conservation at the time of benign hysterectomy.DATA SOURCES:MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials. gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to January 30, 2015. We included prospective and retrospective comparative studies of women with benign hysterectomy who had either bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) or conservation of one or both ovaries.METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:Reviewers double-screened 5,568 citations and extracted eligible studies into customized forms. Twenty-six comparative studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were assessed for results, quality, and strength of evidence.