Multipolarity and the Future of Multilateralism: Towards ‘Thick’ Peacekeeping in the Donbas Conflict

Multipolarity and the Future of Multilateralism: Towards ‘Thick’ Peacekeeping in the Donbas Conflict
复制标题

多极化与多边主义的未来:在顿巴斯冲突中迈向“密集”维和

DOI:
10.1111/1758-5899.12790
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Takamitsu Hadano
Takamitsu Hadano
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
神田秀樹;公益財団法人資本市場研究会;資本市場研究会;新川匠郎;山代忠邦;山代忠邦;築山宏樹;築山宏樹;築山宏樹;Hiroki Tsukiyama;築山宏樹;Hiroki Tsukiyama;築山宏樹;Hiroki Tsukiyama;Hiroki Tsukiyama;Takamitsu Hadano

文献摘要

相似文献

本文有助于研究多极化与多边主义的关系。本文的目的之一是通过调查俄罗斯对多边主义的态度,特别是在顿巴斯冲突的背景下,来思考多边主义在多极化时代的作用。俄罗斯一直是多中心世界秩序的坚定支持者。因此,分析其对多边主义的态度,有助于深入了解多边主义在新兴多极世界中的作用。有人认为,虽然在多极化时代不能假定各国利益趋同和平等参与,但多边主义仍然可以促进包括新兴大国在内的各国之间的政策协调,并为其政策决定提供合法性。另一个目的是探索维和行动--一种反映多边主义的国际实践--在多极化的世界中能带来什么。本文探讨了最近关于在乌克兰东部部署维和使命的争论,并认为维和不仅有助于实现包括新兴大国在内的国家之间的安全政策协调,而且有助于创造共同的外交文化,从而在它们之间形成一种我们的感觉,这反过来可能发展成为一个包容性的地区安全框架。
This article contributes to research on the relationship between multipolarity and multilateralism. One aim of this article is to consider the role of multilateralism in the age of multipolarity by investigating Russia’s approach to multilateralism, especially in the context of the Donbas conflict. Russia has been a staunch supporter of a polycentric world order. Thus, an analysis of its attitude towards multilateralism provides insights into the role of multilateralism in the emerging multipolar world. It will be argued that, while convergence of interests and equal participation of states cannot be assumed in the age of multipolarity, multilateralism can still facilitate policy coordination among states, including rising powers, and provide legitimacy to their policy decisions. Another aim is to explore what peacekeeping – an international practice reflective of multilateralism – can deliver in the multipolarising world. This article examines recent debates over the deployment of a peacekeeping mission to eastern Ukraine and argues that peacekeeping can not only help achieve security policy coordination among states, including rising powers, but also help create a common diplomatic culture and hence a sense of we‐feeling among them, which may in turn develop into an inclusive regional security framework.