Deliberation and Global Governance: Liberal, Cosmopolitan, and Critical Perspectives
Deliberation and Global Governance: Liberal, Cosmopolitan, and Critical Perspectives
复制标题
审议和全球治理：自由主义、世界主义和批判性视角
DOI：
10.1111/j.1747-7093.2008.00130.x
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
J. Brassett
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
William Smith;J. Brassett
本文对全球治理的审议方法进行了批判性分析。本文首先定义了全球治理，并以最低限度的审议概念为基础，概述了三种范式方法：自由主义，世界主义和批判性。每一种方法的可能性和问题进行了审查，并解决了一个共同关注的范围为“审议性反思”在全球治理。有人认为，每一种方法，在不同程度上，突出了目前的知识不足的状态，全球治理，其关键机构，代理人和做法。在这样做时，“什么是全球治理？”作为现行审议做法的一个重要和反映性要素予以保留。有人认为，这构成了对全球治理的审议办法的独特和重要的见解。
The paper develops a critical analysis of deliberative approaches to global governance. After first defining global governance and with a minimalist conception of deliberation in mind, the paper outlines three paradigmatic approaches: liberal, cosmopolitan, and critical. The possibilities and problems of each approach are examined and a common concern with the scope for “deliberative reflection” in global governance is addressed. It is argued that each approach, to varying degrees, foregrounds the currently underdetermined state of knowledge about global governance, its key institutions, agents, and practices. In doing so, the question “ What is global governance?” is retained as an important and reflective element of ongoing deliberative practices. It is suggested that this constitutes the distinctive and vital insight of deliberative approaches to global governance.