Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations

Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations
复制标题

树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀修复下三种自酸蚀粘合剂热循环后的微渗漏

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
A. Guéders
A. Guéders
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Geerts;L. Seidel;A. Albert;A. Guéders

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本研究旨在评估树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀 (RMGIC) 修复体上出现的微渗漏。在 30 颗拔除的第三磨牙上切出 60 个 V 类蛀牙(高 × 宽 × 长 = 2mm × 2mm × 3mm),并将其随机分配到三个实验组。所有颊腔均使用聚丙烯酸进行预处理,而舌腔分别使用三种一步式自蚀刻粘合剂进行处理:Xeno III(Dentsply Detrey GmbH,德国康斯坦茨)、iBond exp(Heraeus Kulzer gmbH & Co. KG,哈瑙,德国)和 Adper Prompt-L-Pop(3M ESPE AG,牙科公司) 产品德国塞费尔德)。所有空腔均用 RMGIC 完全填充,牙齿热循环 800 次,并评估渗漏情况。结果表示为平均值±标准差(SD)。微泄漏分数通过假设有序逻辑联系函数的广义线性混合模型(GLMM)进行分析。所有结果在 5% 临界水平下均被认为是显着的 (P < .05)。结果表明,使用自蚀刻粘合剂而不是使用聚丙烯酸将 RMGIC 粘合到牙本质不会影响微渗漏分数 (P = .091),除了一种测试的自蚀刻粘合剂,即 Xeno III (P < .0001)。尽管如此,我们的结果并未显示三种测试的自蚀刻粘合剂系统之间存在任何显着差异。总之,根据我们的结果(热循环)和其他结果(微拉伸测试)表明,在 RMGIC 填充之前,使用自酸蚀粘合剂系统对牙本质进行预处理似乎是临床医生传统牙本质调理剂的替代方案。
This study was designed to evaluate microleakage that appeared on Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) restorations. Sixty class V cavities (h × w × l = 2 mm × 2 mm × 3 mm) were cut on thirty extracted third molars, which were randomly allocated to three experimental groups. All the buccal cavities were pretreated with polyacrylic acid, whereas the lingual cavities were treated with three one-step Self-Etch adhesives, respectively, Xeno III (Dentsply Detrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany), iBond exp (Heraeus Kulzer gmbH & Co. KG, Hanau, Germany), and Adper Prompt-L-Pop (3M ESPE AG, Dental products Seefeld, Germany). All cavities were completely filled with RMGIC, teeth were thermocycled for 800 cycles, and leakage was evaluated. Results were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SDs). Microleakage scores were analysed by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) assuming an ordinal logistic link function. All results were considered to be significant at the 5% critical level (P < .05). The results showed that bonding RMGIC to dentin with a Self-Etch adhesive rather than using polyacrylic acid did not influence microleakage scores (P = .091), except for one tested Self-Etch adhesive, namely, Xeno III (P < .0001). Nevertheless, our results did not show any significant difference between the three tested Self-Etch adhesive systems. In conclusion, the pretreatment of dentin with Self-Etch adhesive system, before RMGIC filling, seems to be an alternative to the conventional Dentin Conditioner for the clinicians as suggested by our results (thermocycling) and others (microtensile tests).
VariGlass 与牙本质的粘合机制。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1995
期刊: American journal of dentistry.
影响因子: --
作者:
Carvalho,RM;Yoshiyama,M;Horner,JA;Pashley,DH
通讯作者: Pashley,DH
底漆溶剂、底漆搅拌和牙本质干燥度对牙本质剪切粘合强度的影响。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1998
期刊: American journal of dentistry.
影响因子: --
作者:
Jacobsen,T;Soderholm,KJ
通讯作者: Soderholm,KJ