Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review
Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10488-015-0710-5
复制
发表时间：
2016-05-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Wolpert, Miranda
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gondek, Dawid;Edbrooke-Childs, Julian;Wolpert, Miranda
由于最近在心理健康环境中使用结果测量反馈的增加，我们系统地回顾了关于结果测量反馈对治疗有效性，治疗效率和协作实践影响的证据。在超过一半的32项研究中，反馈条件在至少一个治疗结果变量上具有显著更高的治疗有效性水平。反馈对于非跟踪患者或同时提供给临床医生和患者时特别有效。治疗效率和合作实践的结果不太一致。鉴于研究的异质性，需要更多的研究来确定何时以及对谁来说反馈最有效。
Due to recent increases in the use of feedback from outcome measures in mental health settings, we systematically reviewed evidence regarding the impact of feedback from outcome measures on treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice. In over half of 32 studies reviewed, the feedback condition had significantly higher levels of treatment effectiveness on at least one treatment outcome variable. Feedback was particularly effective for not-on-track patients or when it was provided to both clinicians and patients. The findings for treatment efficiency and collaborative practice were less consistent. Given the heterogeneity of studies, more research is needed to determine when and for whom feedback is most effective.