Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 7: A Reviewer's Checklist
Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 7: A Reviewer's Checklist
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0272989x13485156
复制
发表时间：
2013-07-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Dias, Sofia
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ades, A. E.;Caldwell, Deborah M.;Dias, Sofia
本检查表用于审查基于疗效或成本效益的决策中使用的治疗疗效证据综合。预期用于配对荟萃分析、间接比较和网络荟萃分析，无区别。它不产生质量评级，也不是规定性的。相反，它侧重于一系列问题，旨在揭示综合报告作者期望读者接受的假设，作者为支持其立场而提出的论点是否充分，以及是否需要进一步分析或敏感性分析。该清单主要针对那些在决策背景下审查证据综合（包括间接比较和网络荟萃分析）的人，但对于那些提交综合供审查的人（无论是向决策机构还是期刊）也很有价值。该清单有4个主要标题：A）决策问题的定义，B）结果的分析和呈现方法，C）网络综合的特定问题，以及D）将综合嵌入概率成本效益模型。标题和隐含的建议直接来自本系列中的其他教程。提供了一个简单的表格，可以作为一个形式上的清单。
This checklist is for the review of evidence syntheses for treatment efficacy used in decision making based on either efficacy or cost-effectiveness. It is intended to be used for pairwise meta-analysis, indirect comparisons, and network meta-analysis, without distinction. It does not generate a quality rating and is not prescriptive. Instead, it focuses on a series of questions aimed at revealing the assumptions that the authors of the synthesis are expecting readers to accept, the adequacy of the arguments authors advance in support of their position, and the need for further analyses or sensitivity analyses. The checklist is intended primarily for those who review evidence syntheses, including indirect comparisons and network meta-analyses, in the context of decision making but will also be of value to those submitting syntheses for review, whether to decision-making bodies or journals. The checklist has 4 main headings: A) definition of the decision problem, B) methods of analysis and presentation of results, C) issues specific to network synthesis, and D) embedding the synthesis in a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model. The headings and implicit advice follow directly from the other tutorials in this series. A simple table is provided that could serve as a pro forma checklist.