Toward criteria for pragmatic measurement in implementation research and practice: a stakeholder-driven approach using concept mapping.
Toward criteria for pragmatic measurement in implementation research and practice: a stakeholder-driven approach using concept mapping.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s13012-017-0649-x
复制
发表时间：
2017-10-03
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lewis CC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Powell BJ;Stanick CF;Halko HM;Dorsey CN;Weiner BJ;Barwick MA;Damschroder LJ;Wensing M;Wolfenden L;Lewis CC
推进实施研究和实践需要对实施决定因素、机制、过程、战略和结果采取有效和可靠的措施。然而，如果这些措施不实用，研究人员和实施利益相关者就不太可能使用它们。本研究的目的是建立一个利益相关者驱动的领域概念化，这些领域包括实用度量结构。它建立在对文献的系统回顾和半结构化的利益相关者访谈的基础上，这些访谈产生了47个实用度量标准，并旨在通过确定实用度量结构的概念上不同的类别，并提供标准的清晰度和重要性的定量评级，进一步完善该标准集。24名在实施实践方面具有专业知识的利益相关者完成了一项概念映射活动，其中他们将47个标准的初始列表组织为概念上不同的类别，并对其清晰度和重要性进行了评级。采用多维尺度分析、层次聚类分析和描述性统计对数据进行分析。47个标准被有意义地分为四个不同的类别：(1)可接受的，(2)兼容的，(3)容易的，(4)有用的。在类别和个人标准水平的清晰度和重要性的平均评级将被提出。本研究通过提供清晰和概念上不同的语用措施结构领域，推动了实施科学和实践领域的发展。接下来的步骤将包括德尔福过程，以就最重要的标准达成共识，并制定可用于评估措施的可量化实用评级标准。
Advancing implementation research and practice requires valid and reliable measures of implementation determinants, mechanisms, processes, strategies, and outcomes. However, researchers and implementation stakeholders are unlikely to use measures if they are not also pragmatic. The purpose of this study was to establish a stakeholder-driven conceptualization of the domains that comprise the pragmatic measure construct. It built upon a systematic review of the literature and semi-structured stakeholder interviews that generated 47 criteria for pragmatic measures, and aimed to further refine that set of criteria by identifying conceptually distinct categories of the pragmatic measure construct and providing quantitative ratings of the criteria’s clarity and importance. Twenty-four stakeholders with expertise in implementation practice completed a concept mapping activity wherein they organized the initial list of 47 criteria into conceptually distinct categories and rated their clarity and importance. Multidimensional scaling, hierarchical cluster analysis, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. The 47 criteria were meaningfully grouped into four distinct categories: (1) acceptable, (2) compatible, (3) easy, and (4) useful. Average ratings of clarity and importance at the category and individual criteria level will be presented. This study advances the field of implementation science and practice by providing clear and conceptually distinct domains of the pragmatic measure construct. Next steps will include a Delphi process to develop consensus on the most important criteria and the development of quantifiable pragmatic rating criteria that can be used to assess measures.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
发表时间：
2009-08-07
期刊：
Implementation science : IS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Damschroder LJ;Aron DC;Keith RE;Kirsh SR;Alexander JA;Lowery JC
通讯作者：
Lowery JC
DOI：
10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0
发表时间：
2015-08-07
期刊：
Implementation science : IS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Waltz TJ;Powell BJ;Matthieu MM;Damschroder LJ;Chinman MJ;Smith JL;Proctor EK;Kirchner JE
通讯作者：
Kirchner JE
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Weiner, Bryan J.;Lewis, Cara C.;Halko, Heather
通讯作者：
Halko, Heather
DOI：
10.1186/s13012-015-0287-0
发表时间：
2015-07-22
期刊：
Implementation science : IS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lewis CC;Weiner BJ;Stanick C;Fischer SM
通讯作者：
Fischer SM
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Trochim, W;Kane, M
通讯作者：
Kane, M