Built environment instruments for walkability, bikeability, and recreation: Disability and universal design relevant?
Built environment instruments for walkability, bikeability, and recreation: Disability and universal design relevant?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.12.002
复制
发表时间：
2012-04-01
影响因子：
4.5
通讯作者：
Rimmer, James H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gray, Jennifer A.;Zimmerman, Jennifer L.;Rimmer, James H.
背景资料：尽管有大量的工具来衡量建筑环境对潜在身体活动的影响，但很少有人知道这些工具对残疾人的相关性。目的：本综述包括对建筑环境和身体活动相关工具的深入审查，以及对这些工具的检查，以确定其对残疾人的适用性。方法：在本文中，“建筑环境”一词是指人造结构（例如，例如，在一个实施例中，城市和乡村的设计特点，娱乐设施），可能会促进或阻碍个人的身体活动的能力。对95种测量步行性、骑自行车性和娱乐与残疾和通用设计（UD）相关性的仪器进行了内容分析。仪器也编目根据其他方面，包括心理测量特性，数据收集方式，和影响或use.Results：大约三分之一的所有文书包括一些残疾特定的项目，只有少数UD的原则是一致的所有文书证明。大约有一半的仪器提供心理测量信息。大多数文书使用客观/审计的数据收集方法，较少使用主观/感知和地理信息系统方法。关于仪器的影响/使用，刚刚超过一半的文书中引用的文章同行评审literature.Conclusions：建议新的和修订的建筑环境文书，包括更多地关注特定的残疾人群，纳入所有UD原则，以及注意心理测量质量和测量特异性。(C)2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Background: Despite a plethora of instruments that measure the built environment with respect to its effect on potential physical activity, little is known about how relevant these instruments are for people with disabilities (PWDs).Objective: This review comprises an in-depth review of instruments related to the built environment and physical activity, as well as an examination of such instruments to determine their applicability for PWDs.Methods: In this paper, the term "built environment" refers to human-made structures (e. g., urban and rural design characteristics, recreational structures) that may facilitate or impede an individual's ability to be physically active. A content analysis was conducted on 95 instruments measuring walkability, bikeability, and recreation with respect to disability and universal design (UD) relevance. Instruments were also cataloged according to other dimensions, including psychometric properties, data collection modalities, and impact or use.Results: Roughly one third of all instruments include some disability-specific items, and only a few UD principles are consistently demonstrated across all instruments. Psychometric information is available for approximately one half of the instruments. Most instruments use objective/audit methods of data collection, with less using subjective/perceived and Geographic Information System (GIS) methods. With respect to instrument impact/use, just over one half of the instruments have articles cited in the peer-reviewed literature.Conclusions: Recommendations for new and revised built environment instruments include more focus on specific disability populations, incorporation of all UD principles, as well as attention to psychometric quality and measurement specificity. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.