A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects.
A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects.
复制标题
三种计算机自动视野计检测青光眼缺陷的临床比较。
DOI：
10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010832008
复制
发表时间：
1981
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Drance
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Heijl;S. Drance
在一项74例患者的临床研究中，比较了三种自动计算机视野计（COMPETER、OCTOPUS和PERIMETRON）检测昏迷性视野缺损的能力。本研究包括青光眼患者、视野完全正常的疑似青光眼患者和正常受试者。通过仔细的静态和动态手动视野检查在Tübinger视野计上获得参考视野。所有的自动仪器给出了类似的高检出率的视野损失和低假阳性测试结果。常规手动视野检查是支持自动视野检查结果所必需的，但自动视野检查仪已经可以完成大部分常规视野检查。
The ability to detect glaucomatous field defects of three automatic computerized perimeters (COMPETER, OCTOPUS, and PERIMETRON) was compared in a clinical study of 74 patients. This study included patients with glaucoma, those with suspected glaucoma in whom the visual fields were completely normal, and normal subjects. The reference fields were obtained by careful static and kinetic manual perimetry on the Tübinger perimeter. All the automatic instruments gave similar high rates of detection of visual field loss and low false-positive test results. Quantity conventional manual perimetry is necessary to support automatic perimetric results, but automatic perimeters already can do a large proportion of routine perimetric screening.