The precedence effect: no evidence for an "active" release process found.
The precedence effect: no evidence for an "active" release process found.
复制标题
优先效应：没有发现“主动”释放过程的证据。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1989
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
T. Voinier
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Blauert;G. Canévet;T. Voinier
Hafter等人[Auditory Function：The Neurobiological Bases for Hearing（Wiley，纽约，1988）]已经报道了“发作后适应”，如在侧化范例中用高频咔哒声序列测量的，可以通过呈现额外的短触发信号而立即释放，该触发信号在频谱上不同于咔哒声序列。由于发作后饱和可能是优先效应的心理声学成分之一，因此已经研究了合适的触发信号是否也可能诱导回声抑制的释放。然而，在一些探索性的先例效应设置中，没有观察到这种“主动”释放过程的证据。
Hafter et al. [Auditory Function: The Neurobiological Bases for Hearing (Wiley, New York, 1988)] have reported that "post-onset adaptation," as measured with trains of high-frequency clicks in a lateralization paradigm, can instantly be released by presentation of an additional, short trigger signal, which is spectrally different from the click trains. As post-onset saturation may be one of the psychoacoustic components of the precedence effect, it has been investigated whether suitable trigger signals might also induce a release from echo inhibition. However, no evidence for such an "active" release process could be observed in a number of exploratory precedence-effect settings.