Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity, by Timothy Mitchell. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. 413 pages, illustrations, endnotes, select bibliography, index. US$21.95 (Paper) ISBN 0-520-23261-5
Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity, by Timothy Mitchell. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. 413 pages, illustrations, endnotes, select bibliography, index. US$21.95 (Paper) ISBN 0-520-23261-5
复制标题
专家规则:埃及、技术政治、现代性,作者:蒂莫西·米切尔。
DOI:
10.1017/s0026318400050112
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Alan Mikhail
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Alan Mikhail
One of the most important contributions of this book is its discussion of possible alternative sources for the histories of seventeenth and eighteenth-century Ottoman Egypt. Moving beyond traditional sources for this period, especially the writings of al-Jabarti, Hanna relies upon works like Yusuf al-Maghribi's dictionary of spoken Arabic, Yusuf alShirbini's Hazz al-Quhuf, and, most especially, an untitled work by one Muhammad ibn Hasan Abu Dhakir. Hanna sees her use of these sources and of archival materials from the court records of Ottoman Egypt as an antidote to those histories of Ottoman Egypt written on the basis of the central Ottoman archives of Istanbul. In Hanna's words, these are histories that present "an incomplete or distorted picture" (p. 21) and that often reproduce a kind of "colonial history" (p. 21) where "scholars talk of 'Ottoman' when they really mean Anatolia" (p. 59). What the "Ottoman" means and what about Egyptian culture during this period is "Ottoman" are questions that constantly lurk behind this book but that prove extremely difficult to answer fully. Indeed, Hanna's work is most significant in this regard as it points to one of the most important, understudied, and vexed problems of the history of Ottoman Egypt—namely, the nature of culture during this period. As historians of Ottoman Egypt, we may never come to a complete understanding of the culture of this complex society, but thanks to this book we now have a clearer idea about certain aspects of the lives of members of urban Ottoman Cairo's literate middling ranks. While admittedly suggestive rather than conclusive, Hanna's study is one students of Ottoman Egypt will certainly want to read and one they will surely have to address. Alan Mikhail University of California, Berkeley