Towards a cultural critique of the Digital Humanities
Towards a cultural critique of the Digital Humanities
复制标题
对数字人文的文化批判
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Domenico Fiormonte
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Domenico Fiormonte
“不能认为非母语作家的英语文本反映了他们的白话话语。”A. Suresh Canagarajah，《学术写作的地缘政治学》（Geopolitics of Academic Writing）作者Nisargadatta Maharaj经常说，书是被写出来的，它们从来不是作者写的。只要稍加思考就能明白他的意思。他指的不仅仅是关于灵性问题的书;他指的是所有的书。在显化宇宙的整体运作中，任何必要的书面或口头文字都会自发地出现（.）。没有信用或指责可以附加到任何个别作家的原因很简单，个人只是一个幻想，没有自主的存在。拉梅什·S Balsekar，不朽的经验
«The English texts of nonnative writers cannot be assumed to reflect their vernacular discourses.» A. Suresh Canagarajah, Geopolitics of Academic Writing «[Nisargadatta] Maharaj said quite often that books get written; they are never written by authors. Only a little thought is necessary to see the truth of what he meant. He was NOT referring only to books on spiritual matters; he was referring to all books. In the overall functioning of the manifested universe, whatever was necessary as written or spoken words appeared spontaneously (...). No credit or blame could attach to any individual writer for the simple reason that the individual is a mere illusion and has not autonomous existence.» Ramesh S. Balsekar, Experience of Immortality