Bye, bye, bile: how altered bile acid composition changes small intestinal lipid sensing.
Bye, bye, bile: how altered bile acid composition changes small intestinal lipid sensing.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320873
复制
发表时间:
2020-09
期刊:
影响因子:
24.5
通讯作者:
Lam TKT
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Duca FA;Lam TKT
The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is increasingly recognised as a major contributor to energy homoeostasis that impact obesity progression. The gut represents the first site of interaction between incoming nutrients and the host, generating crucial negative feedback signalling to regulate food intake possibly by altering GI function like gastric emptying. In the case of proximal intestinal lipid sensing, several mechanisms have been identified to drive both satiety and satiation. For example, dietary fat is hydrolysed and absorbed into enterocytes. In the upper GI, this stimulates the synthesis of oleoylethanolamide (OEA), which can then act as a signalling molecule to induce satiety via activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and a gut-brain axis. 1 Alternatively, activation of enteroendocrine cells (EECs) by free fatty acids binding to G proteincoupled receptor-40 leads to secretion of gut peptides, like cholecystokinin and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), which slow gastric emptying and reduce food intake. Interestingly, activation of EECs via free fatty acids is hypothesised to occur on the basolateral side, requiring chylomicron formation, and thus dietary fat hydrolysis, similar to OEA production. 2 Given that bile acids, especially cholic acid in mice, emulsify dietary lipids and thus promote efficient hydrolysis and absorption of lipids in the small intestine, their function would implicate a necessity in activating the aforementioned pathways to lower food intake. In GUT, Higuchi et al observed that Cyp8b1-/-mice exhibited reduced body weight and adiposity due to an inhibition of food intake. As expected, lowering cholic acid and other 12α-hydroxylated bile acids via 12α-hydroxylase Cyp8b1 knockout impairs dietary fat absorption. However, they elegantly deciphered the mechanism explaining the unexpectedly decreased body weight and reduced food intake by identifying that the gastric emptying incurred by a lower intestinal lipid-gut peptide signalling axis. 3 Cyp8b1-/-mice exhibited reduced body weight and adiposity due to an inhibition of food intake. Mechanistically, Cyp8b1-/- mice actually had decreased refed jejunal OEA levels, therefore increased intestinal OEA signalling leading to increased satiety is not the driving mechanism for reduced food intake. This is in line with the fact that Cyp8b1-/- mice exhibited reductions in meal size, and not inter-meal interval, suggesting the decrease in food intake is via increased satiation and not satiety. Instead, the authors attributed the reduction in meal size to slowed gastric emptying. First, the authors established this reduction in gastric emptying was lipid-dependent, as feeding of a fat-free diet abolished the reduced food intake and gastric emptying in Cyp8b1-/-mice. Second, the authors established slowed gastric emptying was mediated via GPR119 signalling, as both acute pharmacological inhibition of GPR119 in Cyp8b1-/-mice and genetic knockout of GPR119 (via double knockout) normalised the gastric emptying defect, while double knockout mice exhibited no difference in body weight, adiposity or food intake. Third, reduced gastric emptying was dependent on a combination of peptide YY (PYY) and GLP-1 signalling, and importantly, the authors demonstrated that this was likely downstream of GPR119 activation, as double knockout mice (GPR119 and Cyp8b1) abolished the increase in ileal PYY and GLP-1 levels observed in Cyp8b1-/-mice following a fasting-refeeding study. Thus, the study concluded that reduced adiposity in Cyp8b1-/- mice is due to increased presence of distal small intestinal lipids, potentially activating an ileal GPR119-GLP-1 and–PYY axis that slows gastric emptying to reduce …
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
Kaur, Achint;Patankar, Jay V.;Hayden, Michael R.
通讯作者:
Hayden, Michael R.
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0808567105
发表时间:
2008-10-28
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Samuel, Buck S.;Shaito, Abdullah;Gordon, Jeffrey I.
通讯作者:
Gordon, Jeffrey I.
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Ekberg, Jeppe H.;Hauge, Maria;Schwartz, Thue W.
通讯作者:
Schwartz, Thue W.
影响因子:
15.9
作者:
Li-Hawkins, J;Gåfvels, M;Eggertsen, G
通讯作者:
Eggertsen, G
DOI:
10.1152/ajpendo.00172.2017
发表时间:
2018-05-01
影响因子:
5.1
作者:
Patankar, Jay, V;Wong, Chi K.;Hayden, Michael R.
通讯作者:
Hayden, Michael R.