Reporting Bias in Coverage of Iran Protests by Global News Agencies
Reporting Bias in Coverage of Iran Protests by Global News Agencies
复制标题
全球新闻机构对伊朗抗议报道存在偏见
DOI：
10.1177/1940161220966948
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Janice Cho
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oluseyi Adegbola;Sherice Gearhart;Janice Cho
这项研究考察了位于美国(美联社[美联社])、英国(路透社)、法国(法新社)、中国(新华社)和俄罗斯(苏联电讯社[塔斯社])的全球通讯社对2017年12月底至2018年1月初伊朗抗议活动的报道。对关于抗议活动的普查报道(N=369)进行了内容分析。结果表明，新闻机构对被定义为问题、原因诊断、道德评估和治疗建议的问题的描述存在很大差异。新华社的报道与西方新闻机构有很大不同，建议维持伊朗现状的报道所占比例更大。民主国家的私营新闻机构对政治变革的呼声受到了更多关注。虽然各新闻机构对消息来源的使用大致相似，但国有机构的报道中没有出现抗议者的身影。结果得出结论，国家利益和/或全球新闻机构所有权的差异可能解释调查结果，并为有关外国抗议的新闻报道提供洞察。
This study examines reporting on protests in Iran between late December 2017 and early January 2018 by global news agencies located in the United States (Associated Press [AP]), United Kingdom (Reuters), France (Agence France-Presse [AFP]), China (Xinhua), and Russia (Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union [TASS]). A census of reporting on the protests (N = 369) was content analyzed. Results demonstrate that news agencies varied considerably in their portrayal of issues defined as problems, diagnosis of causes, moral evaluations, and treatment recommendations. Reporting by Xinhua differed considerably from Western news agencies and featured a greater proportion of stories recommending maintenance of the status quo in Iran. Calls for political change received more attention in privately owned news agencies based in democratic nations. While the use of sources in news stories was generally similar across agencies, protesters were absent in reporting by state-owned agencies. Results conclude that differences in national interests and/or ownership of global news agencies may explain findings and provide insight into news reporting on foreign protest.
抗议事件数据分析：使用特定国家的事件数据集解决跨国比较问题
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Wada;Takeshi
通讯作者：
Takeshi