Ultrasound Method for Estimating the Cross-Sectional Area of the Psoas Major Muscle

Ultrasound Method for Estimating the Cross-Sectional Area of the Psoas Major Muscle
复制标题

DOI:
10.1249/mss.0b013e31821994cb
复制
发表时间:
2011-10-01
期刊:
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Fukunaga, Tetsuo
Fukunaga, Tetsuo
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Takai, Yohei;Katsumata, Yoichi;Fukunaga, Tetsuo

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

高井,Y.,Y.胜俣,Y.川上,H.兼久,和T.福永。估计腰大肌横截面积的超声方法。医学。科学。体育锻炼,卷。 43,第 10 期,第 2000-2004 年,2011 年。目的:本研究旨在开发一种超声检查方法来估计腰大肌的横截面积。方法:使用磁共振成像技术测量 11 名 21 至 25 岁健康久坐男性的身体左右两侧 L4-L5 腰大肌的肌肉横截面积(CSA(MRI))和厚度(MT(MRI))。在进行 CSA(MRI) 和 MT(MRI) 测量的相应部位获得超声图像。根据超声图像,分析身体两侧腰大肌 (MT(US)) 的厚度。结果:在两天内进行的 MT(US) 测量的组间相关系数右侧为 0.951,左侧为 0.971。 CSA(MRI) 与 MT(MRI) 显着相关(右侧 r = 0.934,左侧 r = 0.910)。 MT(MRI)(右侧4.68 +/- 0.39 cm,左侧4.73 +/- 0.39 cm)和MT(US)(右侧4.67 +/- 0.40 cm,左侧4.72 +/- 0.43 cm)之间没有显着差异。 MT(US) 与 MT(MRI)(右侧 r = 0.979,左侧 r = 0.980)和 CSA(MRI)(右侧 r = 0.947,左侧 r = 0.916)显着相关。结论:目前的结果表明,超声法测定的腰大肌厚度对于估计腰大肌的横截面积是有用的。
TAKAI, Y., Y. KATSUMATA, Y. KAWAKAMI, H. KANEHISA, and T. FUKUNAGA. Ultrasound Method for Estimating the Cross-Sectional Area of the Psoas Major Muscle. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 2000-2004, 2011. Purpose: The present study aimed to develop an ultrasonographic method for estimating the cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle. Methods: The muscle cross-sectional area (CSA(MRI)) and thickness (MT(MRI)) of the psoas major muscle at L4-L5 on the right and left sides of the body were measured using magnetic resonance imaging in 11 healthy sedentary men age 21 to 25 yr. Ultrasonographic images were obtained at the corresponding sites where CSA(MRI) and MT(MRI) measurements were performed. From the ultrasonographic images, the thickness of the psoas major muscle (MT(US)) was analyzed on both sides of the body. Results: The interclass correlation coefficient of MT(US) measurements performed on two separated days was 0.951 for the right side and 0.971 for the left side. CSA(MRI) was significantly correlated to MT(MRI) (r = 0.934 for the right side and r = 0.910 for the left side). There was no significant difference between MT(MRI) (4.68 +/- 0.39 cm for the right side and 4.73 +/- 0.39 cm for the left side) and MT(US) (4.67 +/- 0.40 cm for the right side and 4.72 +/- 0.43 cm for the left side). The MT(US) was significantly correlated to MT(MRI) (r = 0.979 for the right side and r = 0.980 for the left side) and CSA(MRI) (r = 0.947 for the right side and r = 0.916 for the left side). Conclusion: The current results indicate that the psoas major muscle thickness determined by the ultrasonographic method is useful for estimating the cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle.