The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
复制标题
阅读过程中视觉对比度和大小写变化对中心凹预览益处的影响。
DOI：
10.1080/17470210903147494
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Inhoff,AlbrechtW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wang,Chin-An;Inhoff,AlbrechtW
Reingold和Rayner（2006）表明，固定目标词的视觉对比影响其观看时间，但不影响文本中下一个（后目标）词的观看。对比之下，解释性目标的变化影响了目标和目标后的观看。本研究探讨了这种效应模式是否可以归因于目标观看过程中对后目标词的差异加工。边界范式（Rayner，1975）被用来提供一个信息或非信息的后靶预览，并揭示了这个词时，它被固定。与早期的研究一致，当目标的视觉对比度较低且其配置不熟悉时，会花费更多的时间观看目标。重要的是，目标对比度没有影响收购有用的信息，从posttarget预览，但一个不熟悉的目标配置减少了有用的信息posttarget预览。这些发现与Reingold和Rayner（2006）的主张一致，即阅读过程中的眼跳编程和注意力转移可以由功能不同的单词识别过程控制。
Reingold and Rayner (2006) showed that the visual contrast of a fixated target word influenced its viewing duration, but not the viewing of the next (posttarget) word in the text that was shown in regular contrast. Configurational target changes, by contrast, influenced target and posttarget viewing. The current study examined whether this effect pattern can be attributed to differential processing of the posttarget word during target viewing. A boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) was used to provide an informative or uninformative posttarget preview and to reveal the word when it was fixated. Consistent with the earlier study, more time was spent viewing the target when its visual contrast was low and its configuration unfamiliar. Critically, target contrast had no effect on the acquisition of useful information from a posttarget preview, but an unfamiliar target configuration diminished the usefulness of an informative posttarget preview. These findings are consistent with Reingold and Rayner's (2006) claim that saccade programming and attention shifting during reading can be controlled by functionally distinct word recognition processes.