Generative processing and emotional false memories: a generation "cost" for negative false memory formation but only after delay.
Generative processing and emotional false memories: a generation "cost" for negative false memory formation but only after delay.
复制标题
生成处理和情感错误记忆：负面错误记忆形成的一代“成本”，但仅在延迟之后。
DOI：
10.1080/02699931.2022.2128063
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Knott L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Knott L
先前的研究表明，促进真实记忆的操作（如处理水平）往往会增加对虚假记忆的易感性。一个例外是生成效应。Soraci等人使用Deese/ Roediger-McDermott （DRM）范式发现，生成而不是阅读清单项目会导致真实记忆的增加，而不是错误记忆的增加。他们认为，一代导致了增强的物品独特性，从而降低了错误记忆的产生。在当前的研究中，我们研究了生成加工对有价刺激的影响，并在延迟保留间隔后检查可能导致生成效应增加错误记忆的因素。在即时测试中，在读取和生成条件下，负面和中性价值临界诱饵的错误识别率相似。然而，在延迟一周后，我们看到了效价分化，对错误识别有产生效应，但只对负面刺激有产生效应。讨论了项目特定加工和关系加工在编码过程中的作用及其与长期记忆的相互作用。
Previous research shows that manipulations (e.g. levels-of-processing) that facilitate true memory often increase susceptibility to false memory. An exception is the generation effect. Using the Deese/Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm, Soraci et al. found that generating rather than reading list items led to an increase in true but not false memories. They argued that generation led to enhanced item-distinctiveness that drove down false memory production. In the current study, we investigated the effects of generative processing on valenced stimuli and after a delayed retention interval to examine factors that may lead to a generation effect that increases false memories. At the immediate test, false recognition rates for both negative and neutral valanced critical lures were similar across read and generate conditions. However, after a one-week delay, we saw a valence differentiation, with a generation effect for false recognition but only for negative stimuli. The roles of item-specific and relational processing during encoding and their interaction with long-term retention are discussed.