On the de rham cohomology of algebraic varieties
On the de rham cohomology of algebraic varieties
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/bf02684298
复制
发表时间:
1975-12
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Hartshorne
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Hartshorne
The idea of using differential forms and their integrals to define numerical invariants of algebraic varieties goes back to Picard and Lefschetz. More recently, Atiyah and Hodge [2] and Grothendieck [16] showed that algebraic differential forms could be used to calculate the singular cohomology of a smooth scheme over C. This algebraictopological comparison theorem has been generalized by Lieberman and Herrera [29] and by Deligne (unpublished) to include the case of singular schemes over C. Lieberman and Herrera also proved a duality theorem for first order differential operators, of which our Theorem (II. 5. i) is a special case. See also Lieberman [49] for another comparison theorem.In another context, algebraic differential forms have proved to be useful in the study of the monodromy of a family of complex varieties, using the Gauss-Manin connection. SeeKatzandOda [34], Katz ([32] and [33]), Deligne [10], and Brieskorn [8]. In the purely analytic context, holomorphic differentials on a singular analytic space have been studied by Reiffen [44] and Bloom and Herrera [5]. Finally in the study of varieties in characteristic p, algebraic differential forms are important in Monsky's formal cohomology [38], and as motivation for Grothendieck's crystalline cohomology ([18] and [4]).