Television- and Screen-Based Activity and Mental Well-Being in Adults
Television- and Screen-Based Activity and Mental Well-Being in Adults
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.030
复制
发表时间：
2010-04-01
影响因子：
5.5
通讯作者：
Mishra, Gita D.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hamer, Mark;Stamatakis, Emmanuel;Mishra, Gita D.
背景资料：久坐行为正在成为身体健康的一个独立危险因素，尽管目前还没有关于心理健康的证据。目的：本研究旨在探讨休闲久坐行为与心理健康之间的关系。（基于电视和屏幕为基础的娱乐[TVSE]时间）和心理健康在一个有代表性的样本的adultsMethods：参与者为3920名男性和女性（平均年龄51 0 +/- 15.8岁），来自2003年苏格兰健康调查。一般健康问卷（GHQ-12）和心理健康组成部分的12项简表调查工具（MCS-12）进行管理，以获得信息，目前的心理健康。自我报告的TVSE时间，身体活动和身体功能也进行了测量。2009年进行了分析，结果：大约2596名参与者每天至少进行4小时的TVSE。在一般线性模型中，每周TVSE时间与GHQ-12评分独立相关（得分越高表示心理健康状况越差），在调整年龄、性别、体力活动、身体功能、区域剥夺水平、吸烟、酒精、水果和蔬菜摄入量后，完全校正后，TVSE水平最高组（>4小时/天）的参与者与TVSE水平最低组（
Background: Sedentary behavior is emerging as an independent risk factor for physical health, although there is no existing evidence regarding mental well-being.Purpose: This study aimed to examine the association between recreational sedentary behavior (based on TV- and screen-based entertainment [TVSE] time) and mental health in a representative sample of adultsMethods: Participants were 3920 men and women (mean age 51 0 +/- 15.8 years) from the 2003 Scottish Health Survey. The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the mental health component of the 12-Item Short-Form Survey Instrument (MCS-12) were administered to obtain information on current mental health. Self-reported TVSE time, physical activity, and physical function was also measured. Analyses were conducted in 2009Results: Approximately 2596 of participants engaged in at least 4 hours/day of TVSE In general linear models, TVSE time per week was independently associated with GHQ-12 score (higher scores represent worse mental health status) after adjustment for age, gender, physical activity, physical function, area deprivation level, smoking, alcohol, fruit and vegetable intake, and BM I After full adjustment, participants in the group with the highest TVSE level (>4 hours/day) had an increase in GHQ-12 score of 0.28 (95% CI = 0 05, 0.51) compared with participants in the group with the lowest TVSE level (