The Effect of Safety Signs on the Monitoring of Conflict and Erroneous Response.

The Effect of Safety Signs on the Monitoring of Conflict and Erroneous Response.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830929
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Zheng J
Zheng J
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hu L;Feng D;Li Y;Xu J;Zheng J

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

安全标志在我们的日常生活和工作场所中非常重要,可以防止潜在的安全问题。然而,安全标志是否会影响人们的认知控制能力,从而以目标为导向的方式引导行为,目前尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在通过揭示冲突和错误监控背后的行为表现和神经表现来检验安全标志对认知控制的影响。参与者在观看低危险和高危险安全标志以及连续记录的脑电图(EEG)数据后执行侧翼任务。行为结果表明,与不一致条件相比,在一致条件下具有更高的准确率和更快的响应时间的经典一致性效应。然而,没有观察到对行为表现的危险影响。事件相关电位(ERP)的结果表明,与低危险条件下的情况相比,不一致的试验引起了更多的负N2,并且高危险条件下错误和正确反应之间的(错误相关负性)ERN差异增加,这意味着在观察高危险安全标志后,对冲突和错误的监测都得到了加强。这项研究有助于理解安全标志与认知控制之间的关系,并进一步扩展可用于评估安全标志设计有效性的测量方法。
The safety sign is important in our daily life and workplace to prevent potential safety issues. However, it remains undetermined whether the safety signs would influence the cognitive control ability of the people, which serves to guide the behaviors in a goal-directed manner. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effect of safety signs on cognitive control by uncovering the behavioral performance and neural manifestations underlying the monitoring of conflict and error. The participants performed a flanker task after watching low- and high-hazard safety signs with the electroencephalogram (EEG) data recorded continually. The behavioral results indicated a classic congruency effect with higher accuracy rate and faster response time under a congruent condition compared to an incongruent condition. However, no hazard effect on behavioral performances was observed. The results of event-related potentials (ERPs) demonstrated a more negative N2 elicited by the incongruent trials and an increased (error-related negativity) ERN difference between the error and correct responses in the high-hazard condition compared to those in the low-hazard condition, implying that the monitoring of the conflict and error were both enhanced after watching the high-hazard safety signs. This study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between safety signs and cognitive control, and further expand the measurements that can be applied to assess the effectiveness of safety signs design.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010273
发表时间: 2021-01-01
影响因子: --
作者:
Gao J;Wu X;Luo X;Guan S
通讯作者: Guan S
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.036
发表时间: 2011-02
期刊: Neuropsychologia
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Hughes G;Yeung N
通讯作者: Yeung N
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00860.x
发表时间: 2009-11-01
期刊: PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Danielmeier, Claudia;Wessel, Jan R.;Ullsperger, Markus
通讯作者: Ullsperger, Markus
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.10.002
发表时间: 2014-12-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Bode, Stefan;Stahl, Jutta
通讯作者: Stahl, Jutta
DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s248947
发表时间: 2020-01-01
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Bian, Jun;Fu, Huijian;Jin, Jia
通讯作者: Jin, Jia