Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review.
Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review.
复制标题
有效传播研究对美国决策者的策略：系统评价。
DOI：
10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3
复制
发表时间：
2020-10-15
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Brownson RC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ashcraft LE;Quinn DA;Brownson RC
研究有可能影响美国的社会政策;然而，在这一领域的现有研究缺乏一个连贯的信息。研究传播模式提供了一个框架，通过该框架，可以综合迄今为止从研究中吸取的经验教训，将研究成果转化为美国决策者。系统地审查了同行审查和灰色文献，以了解向美国决策者传播社会政策研究的共同战略。我们搜索了Academic Search Premier，PolicyFile，SocINDEX，Social Work Abstracts和Web of Science，时间从1980年1月到2019年12月。文章由两名研究者进行独立审查和主题分析，并使用研究传播模型进行组织。检索得到5225篇标题和摘要，以供纳入考虑。共审查了303篇全文文章，其中27篇符合纳入标准。研究传播的常见来源包括政府、学术研究人员、同行评审文献和独立组织。传播最频繁的研究课题与卫生有关，立法者和行政分支管理人员是最常见的目标受众。印刷材料和个人交流是向决策者传播研究成果的最常见渠道。各级政府的传播渠道各不相同（例如，与其他级别相比，联邦一级的立法程序更为正式。这项工作的结果表明，传播是最有效的，当它开始早，激发支持，使用冠军和经纪人，考虑上下文因素，是及时的，相关的，和访问，并知道的球员和过程。向美国政策制定者有效传播研究成果是存在的;然而，严格的定量评估是罕见的。一些贯穿各领域的战略似乎有助于将研究证据转化为政策。没有登记。
Research has the potential to influence US social policy; however, existing research in this area lacks a coherent message. The Model for Dissemination of Research provides a framework through which to synthesize lessons learned from research to date on the process of translating research to US policymakers. The peer-reviewed and grey literature was systematically reviewed to understand common strategies for disseminating social policy research to policymakers in the United States. We searched Academic Search Premier, PolicyFile, SocINDEX, Social Work Abstracts, and Web of Science from January 1980 through December 2019. Articles were independently reviewed and thematically analyzed by two investigators and organized using the Model for Dissemination of Research. The search resulted in 5225 titles and abstracts for inclusion consideration. 303 full-text articles were reviewed with 27 meeting inclusion criteria. Common sources of research dissemination included government, academic researchers, the peer reviewed literature, and independent organizations. The most frequently disseminated research topics were health-related, and legislators and executive branch administrators were the most common target audience. Print materials and personal communication were the most common channels for disseminating research to policymakers. There was variation in dissemination channels by level of government (e.g., a more formal legislative process at the federal level compared with other levesl). Findings from this work suggest that dissemination is most effective when it starts early, galvanizes support, uses champions and brokers, considers contextual factors, is timely, relevant, and accessible, and knows the players and process. Effective dissemination of research to US policymakers exists; yet, rigorous quantitative evaluation is rare. A number of cross-cutting strategies appear to enhance the translation of research evidence into policy. Not registered.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Allen, Sean T.;Ruiz, Monica S.;O'Rourke, Allison
通讯作者：
O'Rourke, Allison
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Best, Allan;Holmes, Bev
通讯作者：
Holmes, Bev
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Dodson, Elizabeth A.;Geary, Nora A.;Brownson, Ross C.
通讯作者：
Brownson, Ross C.
影响因子：
16.4
作者：
BRIM, OG;DUSTAN, J
通讯作者：
DUSTAN, J
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Dodson, Elizabeth A.;Eyler, Amy A.;Wintrode, Christopher G.
通讯作者：
Wintrode, Christopher G.