European Neighbourhood Policy: Strategy or Placebo?
European Neighbourhood Policy: Strategy or Placebo?
复制标题
欧洲睦邻政策：战略还是安慰剂？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Emerson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Emerson
欧盟现在面临着一个生存的困境，显然是要在两种选择之间做出选择：一种是过度扩大扩大进程，以至于破坏其自身的治理能力，另一种是否认其创始价值之一，即向所有欧洲民主国家开放，并可能因排斥邻国而产生负面影响。新兴的欧洲睦邻政策（ENP）试图走出这一困境。这一政策似乎经历了一个熟悉的欧盟重大倡议的三阶段过程：首先，重要的想法进入政治讨论，第二，欧盟机构采取不足以完成任务的适度初步行动，第三，欧盟接受需要采取与挑战相称的可信行动。ENP已迅速从第一阶段进入第二阶段，并有可能进入第三阶段，但尚不清楚各机构现在是否会继续充分制定其建议。这个问题是巴罗佐先生主持的新委员会面临的最准确和最重大的挑战之一。新成员国代表了欧盟的最新资源，这将极大地促进欧洲核政策的成功。
The EU now faces an existential dilemma in the apparent choice to be made between over-extending the enlargement process to the point of destroying its own governability, versus denying one of its founding values to be open to all European democracies and possibly generating negative effects from the exclusion of countries in its neighbourhood. The newly emerging European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) seeks a way out of the dilemma. This policy seems to pass through a familiar three-stage process for major EU initiatives: first the important idea enters political discourse, second the EU institutions take modest initial actions that are not up to the task and third, the EU accepts the need for credible action at a level commensurate with the challenge. The ENP has passed rapidly from the first to the second stage, with potential to move to the third stage, without it yet being clear whether the institutions will now go on to sufficiently develop their proposals. This issue presents itself as one of the most precise and significant challenges facing the new Commission presided by Mr Barroso. The new member states represent the EU’s newest resource, which could greatly contribute to a successful ENP.