2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group
2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/brs.0000000000001061
复制
发表时间：
2015-11-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
van Tulder, Maurits W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Furlan, Andrea D.;Malmivaara, Antti;van Tulder, Maurits W.
研究设计.颈背痛及相关脊柱疾病干预试验的系统评价方法指南帮助作者设计、实施和报告该领域试验的系统评价。背景资料概要。1997年，科克伦回顾组编辑委员会发布了系统评价方法指南，并于2003年和2009年进行了更新。自那时以来，出现了新的方法学证据，标准也发生了变化，因此显然需要对2009年准则进行修订。2015年5月，该小组更名为科克伦背部和颈部方法。编辑委员会于2014年9月举行会议，审查相关的新方法证据，并确定如何将其纳入。咨询委员会的成员进行了协商。根据收到的反馈，编写了更新的方法指南，并由编辑委员会批准。我们更新了7个类别的建议：目的、文献检索、选择标准、偏倚风险评估、数据提取、数据分析以及结果和结论报告。每个类别分为最低标准（强制性）和进一步指导（可选）。本次更新还包括一些新的指南，用于编写结果汇总表和进行非干预性审查。在已发表的科学文章（共1193篇）中对方法指南先前版本的引用表明，其他人可能会发现本指南有助于计划、实施或评价背部和颈部疼痛以及脊柱疾病领域的系统性综述。
Study Design. Method guideline for systematic reviews of trials of interventions for neck and back pain, and related spinal disorders.Objective. To help authors design, conduct, and report systematic reviews of trials in this field.Summary of Background Data. In 1997, the Cochrane Back Review Group editorial board published the Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews, which was updated in 2003 and in 2009. Since then, new methodological evidence has emerged and standards have changed, therefore it was clear that revisions were needed to the 2009 guideline. In May 2015 the group changed its name to Cochrane Back and Neck.Methods. The editorial board met in September 2014 to review the relevant new methodological evidence and determine how it should be incorporated. Members of the advisory board were consulted. Based on the feedback received, an updated method guideline was prepared and approved by the editorial board.Results. We have updated recommendations in 7 categories: objectives, literature search, selection criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and reporting of results and conclusions. Each category is classified into minimum criteria (mandatory) and further guidance (optional). This update also includes some new guidance for preparation of summary of finding tables and for conducting nonintervention reviews.Conclusion. Citations of previous versions of the method guideline in published scientific articles (1193 in total) suggest that others may find this guideline useful to plan, conduct, or evaluate systematic reviews in the field of back and neck pain, and spinal disorders.