Variation of Cone Photoreceptor Packing Density with Retinal Eccentricity and Age
Variation of Cone Photoreceptor Packing Density with Retinal Eccentricity and Age
复制标题
DOI:
10.1167/iovs.11-7199
复制
发表时间:
2011-09-01
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Burns, Stephen A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Song, Hongxin;Chui, Toco Yuen Ping;Burns, Stephen A.
PURPOSE. To study the variation of cone photoreceptor packing density across the retina in healthy subjects of different ages.METHODS. High-resolution adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) systems were used to systematically image the retinas of two groups of subjects of different ages. Ten younger subjects (age range, 22-35 years) and 10 older subjects (age range, 50-65 years) were tested. Strips of cone photoreceptors, approximately 12 degrees x 1.8 degrees long were imaged for each of the four primary retinal meridians: superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal. Cone photoreceptors within the strips were counted, and cone photoreceptor packing density was calculated. Statistical analysis (three-way ANOVA) was used to calculate the interaction for cone photoreceptor packing density between age, meridian, and eccentricity.RESULTS. As expected, cone photoreceptor packing density was higher close to the fovea and decreased with increasing retinal eccentricity from 0.18 to 3.5 mm (similar to 0.6-12 degrees). Older subjects had approximately 75% of the cone density at 0.18 mm (similar to 0.6), and this difference decreased rapidly with eccentricity, with the two groups having similar cone photoreceptor packing densities beyond 0.5 mm retinal eccentricity on average.CONCLUSIONS. Cone packing density in the living human retina decreases as a function of age within the foveal center with the largest difference being found at our most central measurement site. At all ages, the retina showed meridional difference in cone densities, with cone photoreceptor packing density decreasing faster with increasing eccentricity in the vertical dimensions than in the horizontal dimensions. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7376-7384) DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-7199