Using Eye Tracking to Understand the Engeneering Designers´ Behavior in Synthesis-Driven Analyzing Processes-Experiences in Study Design
Using Eye Tracking to Understand the Engeneering Designers´ Behavior in Synthesis-Driven Analyzing Processes-Experiences in Study Design
复制标题
使用眼动追踪了解工程设计师在综合驱动分析过程中的行为 - 研究设计中的经验
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
S. Matthiesen
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Ruckpaul;Ariane Kriltz;S. Matthiesen
Understanding the engineers’ behavior during problem solving is necessary in order to provide suitable methods, which support engineers during their daily work. For observing and recording their behavior in experimental studies, this paper presents experiences in the study design using eye tracking for observing synthesis-driven analysis processes of engineering designers. The design task of the study aims to be close to tasks of engineering practices. Hereby, analysis and synthesis are not separated and the synthesis-driven analysis processes can be observed. An explorative study shows possibilities and advantages of the experimental design, using eye tracking for observing the engineering designers’ behavior in synthesis-driven analysis processes. Several kinds of materials are provided to the subject for not limiting them in their analysis processes. The experimental setup should meet the demands on the task design and task analysis: objectivity, reliability, validity, empirical relevance and adequate difficulty. The tracked gaze data contributes significantly to fulfil these demands. The paper presents possibilities how to process the eye tracking data with the aim to understand the analysis processes of engineers. A top-down representation of the stimulus and overlapping areas of interests enable a flexible observation of the subjects’ processes and courses of actions. The demands on the experimental and task design – objectivity, reliability, validity and empirical relevance – could be met in the explorative study. An adequate difficulty of the task can be verified for the chosen group of subjects. Differences in the behavior of engineering designers during synthesis-driven analysis are the content of further empirical studies.