SOCIAL SUPPORT FOR WOMEN DURING CHRONIC ILLNESS - THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG SOURCES AND TYPES TO ADJUSTMENT
SOCIAL SUPPORT FOR WOMEN DURING CHRONIC ILLNESS - THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG SOURCES AND TYPES TO ADJUSTMENT
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/nur.4770130304
复制
发表时间：
1990-06-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
WOODS, NF
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
PRIMOMO, J;YATES, BC;WOODS, NF
本研究的目的是探讨谁在网络中提供什么类型的支持关系到心理社会适应的慢性疾病的妇女。研究人员对125名患有慢性疾病的女性进行了诺贝克社会支持问卷调查，并对她们进行了抑郁（CES‐D）、家庭疾病需求（疾病需求量表）、婚姻质量（西班牙二元调整量表）和家庭功能（FACES‐II）的测量。重复测量方差分析用于检查来自四个主要来源的平均支持量：伴侣、家人、朋友和其他人。女性认为来自伴侣的支持比其他任何来源都要多。家庭成员比朋友或其他人提供了更多的情感支持。朋友比家人或其他人提供更多的肯定。在伴侣去世后，女性更多地向医疗保健提供者、咨询师或宗教人员倾诉自己的病情，而不是向家人或朋友倾诉。计算每个来源的支持量和个体、二元或家庭调整措施的Pearson相关系数。总的来说，来自伴侣和家庭的情感、肯定和互惠与较少的抑郁、更高的婚姻质量和更好的家庭功能有关。
The purpose of this study was to explorewhoin the network providedwhat type of supportin relation to psychosocialadjustmentfor women experiencing chronic illness. The Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire was administered to 125 chronically ill women, along with measures of depression (CES‐D), family illness demands (Demands of Illness Inventory), marital quality (Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale), and family functioning (FACES‐II). Repeated‐measures ANOVA was used to examine the average amount of support from four main sources: partner, family, friends, and others. Women perceived more support from the partner than from any other source. Family members provided more affective support than friends or others. Friends provided more affirmation than family or others. After the partner, women reported confiding about their illness more to health care providers, counselors, or religious personnel than family or friends. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed for the amount of support from each source and the measures of individual, dyadic, or family adjustment. In general, affect, affirmation, and reciprocity from both the partner and family were associated with less depression, higher marital quality, and better family functioning.