A COMPARISON OF CONTACT MICROPHONE AND ELECTROGLOTTOGRAPH FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF VOCAL FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY
A COMPARISON OF CONTACT MICROPHONE AND ELECTROGLOTTOGRAPH FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF VOCAL FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY
复制标题
DOI：
10.1044/jshr.2302.258
复制
发表时间：
1980-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
KITZING, P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
ASKENFELT, A;GAUFFIN, J;KITZING, P
来自喉部接触式麦克风或电声门描记器的信号通常比辐射语音信号更适合使用简单的模拟电路进行基频测量。对放置在环状软骨下方颈部的接触式（加速计）麦克风和用于测量连接的[人类]语音中的基频的电声门记录仪进行了比较。讨论了2种方法的优点和缺点。
Signals from a throat contact microphone or an electroglottograph are often more suited for fundamental frequency measurements with simple analog circuits than the radiated speech signal. A contact (accelerometer) microphone placed on the neck below the cricoid cartilage and an electroglottograph for measurement of fundamental frequency in connected [human] speech are compared. The advantages and drawbacks of the 2 methods are discussed.