Differences in Soccer Players' Dynamic Balance Across Levels of Competition

Differences in Soccer Players' Dynamic Balance Across Levels of Competition
复制标题

DOI:
10.4085/1062-6050-47.5.14
复制
发表时间:
2012-11-01
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Plisky, Phillip J.
Plisky, Phillip J.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Butler, Robert J.;Southers, Corey;Plisky, Phillip J.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:平衡能力与运动员的表现和受伤预防有关。研究目的:探讨高中、大学和职业男子足球运动员在下象限Y-平衡测试中的差异。设计:描述性实验室研究。设置:现场测试。患者或其他参与者:收集高中、大学和职业男子足球运动员的动态平衡数据。(HS; n = 38)、大学生(n = 37)和专业(n = 44)足球运动员在使用下四分之一Y平衡测试标准化协议进行的运动员体格检查期间的主要结果测量:对于下四分之一Y平衡测试,参与者在前,后内侧,和后外侧方向,同时用另一只脚站在中心站立平台上。对左右肢进行测试。使用单因素方差分析来分析竞争水平之间的到达距离的差异,显著性设置为P <0.05。HS组的前伸距离大于其他2组。相比之下,HS组在后内侧和后外侧方向的可达距离小于其他组。此外,HS球员往往表现出较低的综合达到分数比其他组,但这种差异并不显着(P = 0.08)。各组之间没有观察到差异的双边对称性在任何达到directions.Conclusions:动态平衡性能不同的竞争水平。这可能表明,运动员的运动策略可能会有所不同,这取决于竞争水平和规范值可能需要建立每个竞争水平。
Context: Balance ability has been associated with performance and injury prevention in athletes. Few published reports have investigated the differences in dynamic balance abilities among male high school, collegiate, and professional soccer players.Objective: To examine the differences on the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test in male high school, collegiate, and professional soccer players.Design: Descriptive laboratory study.Setting: Field testing.Patients or Other Participants: Dynamic balance data were collected for male high school (HS; n = 38), collegiate (n = 37), and professional (n = 44) soccer players during preparticipation physical examinations using the Lower Quarter Y Balance Test standardized protocol.Main Outcome Measure(s): For the Lower Quarter Y Balance Test, the participant reaches with 1 foot in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions while standing on a centralized stance platform with the other foot. The test is performed for both left and right limbs. Differences in reach distances between competition levels were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance with significance set at P < .05. The HS group had a greater anterior reach distance than the other 2 groups. In contrast, the HS group had less reach distance in the posteromedial and posterolateral directions than the other groups. Also, HS players tended to exhibit a lower composite reach score than the other groups, but this difference was not significant (P = .08). No differences were observed among groups for bilateral symmetry in any of the reach directions.Conclusions: Dynamic balance performance varied with competition level. This may indicate that athletes' movement strategies may be different depending on the competition level and that normative values may need to be established for each competition level.