Autonomy and the socialisation of architects
Autonomy and the socialisation of architects
复制标题
建筑师的自主性和社会化
DOI：
10.1080/13602365.2014.967271
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Street
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Imrie;E. Street
建筑师身份及其职业形象的社会文化生产是持续争论的活跃根源。一种极端是，对自治的主张强调了建筑的独特性及其文化和学科的特殊性。这种观点受到了那些强调建筑师的行动和行动依赖于他们嵌入集体、社会、环境和关系的人的挑战。在本文中，我们考虑了与建筑师的行为相关的“自主”和“依赖”可能意味着什么。建筑著作中关于什么是自主性和依赖性的具体说明有限，我们建议不要忽视这些术语，而是通过认识到社会构建的自我是个人行为的一个组成部分来重新表述它们。在这方面，我们试图放大和评估关系自主的概念，将自主的概念与建筑师及其实践的个人主义、社会化程度较低的描述区分开来。参考三个实践的经验例子，我们通过以下方式放大了这种理解：首先，概述建筑的关系自主方法可能需要什么；其次，评估它可以在多大程度上实现建筑师实践的概念，按照托尼·弗莱的观察，建筑师的实践被认为比表达其存在的“任何特定活动的特殊性”要广泛得多。
The socio-cultural production of architects' identities, and their professional personas, is a lively source of continuing debate. At one extreme, there is the claim to autonomy that highlights the distinctiveness of architecture and its cultural and disciplinary specificity. This view is challenged by those who emphasise architects' dependence, for acting and actions, on their embeddedness into collective, social, settings and relationships. In the paper, we consider what it may mean to be ‘autonomous of’ and ‘dependent on’ in relation to the actions of architects. There is limited specification in architectural writings about what autonomy and dependence are, and we suggest that there is a need not to discount such terms, but to reformulate them by recognising that the socially constructed self is an integral part of individual action. In this respect, we seek to amplify, and evaluate, the concept of relational autonomy that distances the notion of autonomy from individualistic, under-socialised, accounts of architects and their practices. Referring to three empirical examples of practice, we amplify this understanding by, first, outlining what a relational autonomous approach to architecture might entail, and, secondly, assessing how far it may enable a conception of the practices of architects in ways whereby, following Tony Fry's observations, they are conceived as much broader than ‘the specificity of any particular activity’ that expresses their existence.
重新思考设计思维：第二部分
影响因子：
0.7
作者：
Kimbell L
通讯作者：
Kimbell L