SELF-REGULATORY MECHANISMS GOVERNING THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL-COMPARISON ON COMPLEX DECISION-MAKING
SELF-REGULATORY MECHANISMS GOVERNING THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL-COMPARISON ON COMPLEX DECISION-MAKING
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.941
复制
发表时间：
1991-06-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
JOURDEN, FJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BANDURA, A;JOURDEN, FJ
本研究验证了一个假设，即不同的社会比较模式会通过影响自我调节机制来影响模拟组织中的绩效成就。学生在预先安排的比较反馈下担任组织决策者，他们表现得和他们的比较者一样好，一直超过他们，取得了不断增长的掌握，或经历了逐步下降。进步掌握提高了自我效能感，有效的分析思维，具有挑战性的目标设定，积极的情感自我反应，和组织绩效。相对下降破坏了这些自我调节的因素，并产生了日益恶化的组织业绩。相似和上级的社会比较影响模式具有支持性的自我调节和绩效效应。路径分析显示，自我效能感，分析性思维的质量，个人目标设定，和情感的自我反应作为绩效达成的重要决定因素。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
This study tested the hypothesis that different patterns of social comparison would affect performance attainments in a simulated organization through their impact on mediating self-regulatory mechanisms. Ss served as organizational decision makers under prearranged comparative feedback that they performed as well as their comparators, consistently surpassed them, achieved growing mastery, or experienced progressive decline. Progressive mastery enhanced perceived self-efficacy, efficient analytic thinking, challenging goal setting, aidful affective self-reaction, and organizational performance. Relative decline undermined these self-regulatory factors and produced a growing deterioration of organizational performance. The similar and superior social comparative patterns of influence had a supportive self-regulative and performance effect. Path analyses revealed that perceived self-efficacy, quality of analytic thinking, personal goal setting, and affective self-reactions operated as significant determinants of performance attainments.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)