The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools
The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools
复制标题
环境规制政策工具的减排效应和技术进步效应
DOI：
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.105
复制
发表时间：
2017-04-15
影响因子：
11.1
通讯作者：
Liu, Jun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cheng, Zhonghua;Li, Lianshui;Liu, Jun
如何在环境监管中列出确保减排和技术进步的条款，对中国未来的减排和可持续发展都非常重要。本文利用1997年至2014年中国30个省的统计数据，利用动态空间面板模型对不同类型的环境政策法规对减排和技术进步的影响进行了实证检验。空间自相关检验结果表明，污染物排放和技术进步均存在显著的正向全球自相关和局部空间集聚效应。动态空间面板模型表明，指挥与控制法规(CCR)有利于减排，但对技术进步的影响不显著。市场化监管有利于技术进步，但对减排的作用相对较弱。经济发展水平与碳排放之间存在显著的倒U型关系，验证了中国的EKC假说，但外商直接投资对碳减排和技术进步的影响并不显著。建议中国优化环境法规组合，实现减排与技术进步的双赢。(C)2017爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
How to set out the provisions that ensure emissions reduction and technical progress in environmental regulation is very important for both China's future emissions reduction and sustainable development. The paper uses statistical data from 30 Chinese provinces from 1997 to 2014 and empirically tests the effects of different types of environmental policies and regulations on emissions reduction and technical progress by using dynamic spatial panel models. The results of spatial autocorrelation tests show that there are both significant positive global autocorrelation and local spatial agglomeration effects relating to pollutant emissions and technical progress. Dynamic spatial panel models indicate that command and control regulations (CCR) are conducive to emissions reduction, but their effects on technical progress are not significant. Market based regulations (MBR) are conducive to technical progress, but their effects on the reduction of emissions are relatively weak. There is a significant inverted-U relationship between economic development level and carbon emissions, validating the EKC hypothesis in China, but the effects of foreign direct investment on carbon reduction and technical progress are not significant. The paper recommends that China should optimize a combination of environmental regulations so as to achieve the win-win outcome of both emissions reduction and technical progress. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.