Response to Van Wee and Boarnet
Response to Van Wee and Boarnet
复制标题
对 Van Wee 和 Boarnet 的回应
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Petter Næss
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Petter Næss
·我们对住宅位置和旅行之间的关系非常了解。居住位置影响出行行为的因果机制大多在理论和经验上都有很好的理解，尽管基本的科学调查需要更多的研究·与交通相关的居住自我选择本身就证明了居住位置对出行行为的影响·旅行态度不一定是选择居住位置的先行因素，但本身可能会受到居住位置的影响·在基于态度的居住自我选择中，活动偏好可能与旅行偏好一样重要·旅行态度不是住宅偏好的最重要标准，几个限制因素可能会阻止人们意识到他们本来会更喜欢什么。
• that we know much about the relationships between residential location and travel. The causal mechanisms by which residential location influences travel behavior are mostly well-understood theoretically and empirically well-documented, although basic scientific inquiry requires additional studies • that transport-related residential self-selection is in itself a demonstration of the influence of residential location on travel behavior • that travel attitudes are not necessarily antecedent to choices of residential location but may themselves be influenced by residential location • that activity preferences may be just as important as travel preferences in attitude-based residential self-selection • that travel attitudes are not the most important criteria of residential preferences, and that several constraints can prevent people from realizing what they would otherwise prefer.