Translating Feminism - Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, Place and Agency
Translating Feminism - Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, Place and Agency
复制标题
翻译女权主义——文本、地点和代理的跨学科方法
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-030-79245-9_8
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Guo T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Guo T
尽管有一整套维护妇女权益的立法，但从教育、就业到卫生等中国社会各个领域的性别不平等仍然是一个严重问题。尽管越来越多的文献将中国女权主义运动与国际性别政治联系起来(如Liu et al., Feminism & Psychology, 25: 11-17, 2015; Wesoky, Chinese Feminism Faces Globalization, Routledge, London and New York, 2013；于，《在中国翻译女性主义：性别、性与审查》，劳特利奇出版社，伦敦和纽约，2015年)，很少有人关注女同性恋作为中国性别政治中的边缘群体，以及西方女性主义对中国酷儿女性主义的影响。借鉴同人字幕研究(如Pérez-González，视听翻译：理论，方法和问题，劳特利奇，伦敦，2014;Dwyer, Pérez-González（编），劳特利奇视听翻译手册，劳特利奇，伦敦和纽约，2018；郭和埃文斯，女权主义媒体研究20:515-529,2020)和酷儿媒体行动主义(例如鲍，后社会主义中国的酷儿同志，同性恋身份和同知行动主义，Nias出版社，哥本哈根，2018，Engebretsen等人，2015,Wark，一般知识分子：21世纪的21位思想家，Verso，伦敦和纽约，2017，杨，G. B. 2017。“桥博主、女权主义者和网络民族主义者在中国的网络翻译行动”。数字时代的媒体行动主义，62-75。本章通过酷儿迷对外国酷儿电影的翻译，考察国际酷儿女权主义知识在中国语境下的协商与流通。本章以中国最具影响力的女同性恋字幕团体之一吉华网及其纪录片《政治动物》（Markowitz and ware2016）的翻译为例，探讨吉华网对英语女同性恋媒体内容的翻译如何与全球性别政治交织在一起，并参与了中国酷儿女权主义的兴起。文章认为，一方面，研究、比较和选择合适的中国对等物的过程成为中国酷尔女性主义者“自我制造”的重要过程（Rofel, Desiring China, Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality, and Public Culture, Duke University Press, Durham， NC, 2007）。另一方面，英语女性主义和酷儿知识也在这一过程中得到更新、扩展或批判。
Despite a solid body of legislation defending women’s rights and interests, inequalities between genders remain a significant problem in various areas of Chinese society, from education and employment to health. While there is growing literature on the connection between the Chinese feminist movement and international gender politics (e.g. Liu et al., Feminism & Psychology 25: 11–17, 2015; Wesoky, Chinese Feminism Faces Globalization, Routledge, London and New York, 2013; Yu, Translating Feminism in China: Gender, Sexuality and Censorship, Routledge, London and New York, 2015), little attention has been paid to lesbians as a marginalised group in Chinese gender politics and the impact of Western feminism on queer feminism in China. Drawing from research on fansubbing studies (e.g. Pérez-González, Audiovisual Translation: Theories, Methods and Issues, Routledge, London, 2014; Dwyer, Pérez-González (ed), The Routledge Handbook of Audiovisual Translation, Routledge, London and New York, 2018; Guo and Evans, Feminist Media Studies 20: 515–529, 2020) and queer media activism (e.g. Bao, Queer Comrades, Gay Identity and Tongzhi Activism in Postsocialist China, Nias Press, Copenhagen, 2018, Engebretsen et al. 2015, Wark, General Intellects: Twenty-one Thinkers for the Twenty-First Century, Verso, London and New York, 2017, Yang, G. B. 2017. ‘The Online Translation Activism of Bridge Bloggers, Feminists, and Cyber-nationalists in China’. Media Activism in the Digital Age, 62–75. London: Routledge.), this chapter examines the negotiation and circulation of international queer feminist knowledge in the Chinese context through queer fans’ translation of foreign queer films. Focusing on a case study of Jihua Network, one of the most influential lesbian subtitling groups in China, and its translation of a documentaryPolitical Animals(Markowitz and Wares 2016), this chapter explores how its translation of Anglophone lesbian media content has been intertwined with global gender politics and has participated in the emergence of queer feminism in China. It argues that on the one hand, the process of researching, comparing and choosing the appropriate Chinese equivalents becomes an important process of Chinese queer feminists’ ‘self-making’ (Rofel, Desiring China, Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality, and Public Culture, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2007). On the other hand, Anglophone feminist and queer knowledges are also renewed, expanded or critiqued in this process.