Al-Ghazālī and the Ashʿarite School
Al-Ghazālī and the Ashʿarite School
复制标题
安扎里和阿什阿里派学派
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. M. Frank
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. M. Frank
加扎利（al-Ghazali，1058-1111年）被中世纪思想研究者广泛认为是中世纪伊斯兰思想家中最重要的一位，他仍然是一个极其复杂的人物，他的文本继续给学者们带来严峻的挑战。在这本书中，理查德·M。弗兰克面对加扎利作为一个忠诚的支持者Ash arite教义的传统观点，并重新审视他与学校神学家的关系。弗兰克认为，这种重新审视对于理解加扎利的作品至关重要，他的作品是一系列不同的文本，由于作者的各种姿态和伪装而变得困难。加扎利关于卡拉姆（各学派的思辨神学）及其作为宗教科学的地位的陈述为详细分析提供了重点，并将传统学派神学与他自己的神学进行了对比。由此，加扎利与亚什阿里派的关系问题成为他的方法和语言的基本特征的关键，因此也成为支配他大部分作品的整体意义的关键。最后，正如在阿尔-加扎利著作的时间顺序所反映的那样，弗兰克的分析表明了阿尔-加扎利对阿维森纳哲学的基本要素的承诺，以及他与阿什阿里派建立的逐步疏远。《加扎利和阿什阿里派》对一位中世纪伊斯兰思想家进行了重要而又具有挑衅性的重新评估。它不仅会引起该领域专家的兴趣，而且会引起该时期广泛的历史学家和对伊斯兰教各个方面感兴趣的人的兴趣。
Widely regarded among students of medieval thought as the most important of the medieval Islamic thinkers, al-Ghazali (1058-1111) remains an extremely complex figure whose texts continue to present serious challenges for scholars. In this book, Richard M. Frank confronts the traditional view of al-Ghazali as a loyal supporter of Ash arite doctrine and reexamines his relationship to the school theologians. This reexamination, Frank argues, is essential to an understanding of al-Ghazali's work, a diverse series of texts made difficult by the various postures and guises assumed by their author. Statements by al-Ghazali regarding the kalam (the speculative theology of the schools) and its status as a religious science provide the focus for a detailed analysis that contrasts the traditional school theology with his own. From this, the question of al-Ghazali's relationship to the Ash arite school becomes a key to the basic characteristics of his method and language and therefore to the overall sense that governs much of his work. Finally, as reflected in the chronological sequence of al-Ghazali's writings, Frank's analysis demonstrates al-Ghazali's commitment to basic elements of Avicennian philosophy and his progressive alienation from the Ash arite establishment. Al-Ghazali and the Ash arite School offers an important and provocative reassessment of a major medieval Islamic thinker. It will be of interest not only to specialists in the field, but also to a broad range of historians of the period and to those interested in all aspects of Islam.