Neo-liberal Reforms and Illiberal Consolidations: The Indonesian Paradox
Neo-liberal Reforms and Illiberal Consolidations: The Indonesian Paradox
复制标题
新自由主义改革与反自由主义巩固：印度尼西亚悖论
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Robison
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. Hadiz;R. Robison
近四十年来，以市场为导向的政策议程在印度尼西亚产生了显著的影响。然而，以任何系统方式强加这些议程的企图已证明是不确定和没有结果的。这不仅仅是一个既得利益集团成功抵制改革的例子。相反，在许多情况下，市场资本主义和全球一体化的深化似乎巩固了专制政治和掠夺性经济关系。即使在经济危机和剧烈的政治变革之后，这些基本的权力框架基本上仍然完好无损。这些悖论提出了关于市场、制度以及政治和社会权力之间关系的重要问题。我们研究了市场改革如何被抵制，甚至被劫持，以巩固掠夺性的国家和私人寡头。我们来看看这些根深蒂固的利益集团是如何在面对根本性的制度变革（包括威权统治的崩溃和政治权力的分散）时进行重组的。
Market-oriented policy agendas have enjoyed a remarkable influence in Indonesia for almost four decades. Yet, attempts to impose these agendas in any systematic fashion have proven uncertain and inconclusive. This is not simply a case of successful resistance to reform by entrenched interests. Rather, the deepening of market capitalism and global integration has, in many instances, appeared to consolidate authoritarian politics and predatory economic relationships. Even in the wake of economic crisis and dramatic political change, these basic frameworks of power remain largely intact. Such paradoxes raise important questions about the relationships between markets, institutions and political and social power. We examine how market reforms have been resisted and even hijacked to consolidate predatory state and private oligarchies. We look at the way such entrenched interests have been reorganised in the face of fundamental institutional changes, including the collapse of authoritarian rule and the decentralisation of political authority.